Skip to content
Open access

PLaND Path to Least Non Determinism

Sep 2026 · Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology · 0 citations

TL;DR

These results support selective code execution under the stated tolerances, but do not establish comparative superiority, reliable autonomous rule discovery, or production-workflow performance.

Abstract

Language-model workflows can spend tokens repeatedly applying decisions that explicit code can perform. We present Path to Least Non Determinism (PLaND), a methodology for revising an English standard operating procedure (SOP) by replacing selected model decisions with code while retaining model fallback. Two reusable skills specify baseline construction and development-guided revision; a fixed comparison contract preserves the model, evaluation conditions and complete English fallback. We evaluate the resulting classification packages on LEDGAR legal clauses, CFPB consumer complaints and SpamAssassin email using Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. Each dataset contains 500 development, 1,000 selection and 500 reserved final-test cases. Three paired executions reuse the same cases at each reached stage. Acceptance requires an 80% accuracy floor for both the baseline and hybrid, a paired 95% accuracy-difference interval with lower endpoint at least -2 percentage points, at least 5% token reduction, and a strictly positive lower token-reduction endpoint. LEDGAR passed all final-test repeats: mean accuracy changed from 94.93% to 95.80%, with 74.56% mean token reduction. SpamAssassin also passed: mean accuracy changed from 97.67% to 97.20%, with 28.13% mean token reduction. CFPB was rejected at selection because every hybrid repeat missed the accuracy floor; mean accuracy changed from 79.73% to 79.27%. Its final test was not evaluated. These results support selective code execution under the stated tolerances. They do not establish comparative superiority, reliable autonomous rule discovery, or production-workflow performance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

An Empirical Evaluation of Cost-Efficient Large Language Models on Algorithmic Programming Tasks

This study empirically evaluates whether cost-efficient Large Language Models (LLMs) can be trusted to generate enterprise code to a written specification. Three models (Gemini Flash 3, GPT-5.4 mini and Claude Haiku 4.5) were asked to solve 992 algorithmic problems as Java Spring Boot service methods conforming to a ma...

Chandimal Adikari, Nandika Herath · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

CORE: Conflict-Oriented Reasoning Elimination for Verifiable Language-Model Search

Test-time reasoning systems often respond to failure by restarting or revising the latest step, even when an earlier decision caused the error. We introduce CORE, a search controller that requests a certified conflict core from a verifier, backjumps to the latest decision in that core, and caches the conflict to avoid...

Si-Yu Song, Rui-Peng Xu, Jia Lin et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

Formal Runtime Verification for Tool-Using LLM Agents: An Offline Same-Benchmark Study on AgentDojo and STAC

Results show that formal temporal monitoring adds value exactly when the trace exposes trustworthy history, and quantify how far current benchmarks are from that point and propose a twelve-field enforcement-ready trace schema.

Nikolaos Kekatos, Stylianos Basagiannis, Marinelio Chintri et al. · 2 citations
Open access 2026

Diagnosing Candidate Quality Bottlenecks in RL-Guided LLM Code Repair

An RL-guided repair loop is used as an instrumented diagnostic environment to separate correct-candidate availability from candidate selection and establish general superiority of RL, a selector, or an output representation to single-file Python algorithmic repair on QuixBugs.

Jun-Jun Zhang, Giseop Noh · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

ContractRL: Shielded Group-Relative Policy Optimization for Auditable Tool-Call Repair

Structured tool calls often fail after only a small number of fields violate a schema or an execution contract. Regenerating the complete object enlarges the action surface and makes repeated repair difficult to audit. We introduce ContractRL, a contract-constrained sequential repair protocol that models verifier-guide...

Miao-Bo Hu, Shu-Hao Hu, Xiao-Bo Guo et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Guarded Commits: Transactional Human Approvals for LLM Workflows

A guarded-commit design that makes human approval part of workflow state and supports audit and replay under the policy in force when the resolution was recorded is presented.

Laurent Bindschaedler, Ferdinand Kossmann, Chun-Wei Liu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.