Skip to content

Joint Remaining Useful Life Prediction and Capacity Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Partial-Charging Data

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 37 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper presents a cross-expert framework using partial-charging measurements without requiring measured historical full-cycle capacity as an input, which achieves the lowest reported RUL RMSE among the compared methods on both datasets while maintaining competitive capacity-estimation accuracy.

Abstract

Joint remaining useful life (RUL) prediction and capacity estimation require representations of both gradual degradation and recent battery behavior. This paper presents a cross-expert framework using partial-charging measurements without requiring measured historical full-cycle capacity as an input. The RUL Expert captures long-term degradation from nominal 10-min segments sampled across a 30-cycle history, while the Capacity Expert characterizes recent battery behavior from statistical descriptors of nominal 40-min segments over ten consecutive cycles. Their complementary representations are integrated through feature-wise linear modulation for joint RUL and capacity prediction. A key contribution is a three-stage training strategy that progressively controls frozen and trainable components: supervised representation pretraining, independent expert pretraining, and final fusion training with both experts frozen. This staged optimization preserves expert-specific degradation knowledge while improving the balance between the two prediction tasks, with RUL treated as the primary prognostic objective. On two public battery-aging datasets, the reference configuration achieves mean RUL root-mean-square errors of 143.69 and 161.10 cycles and capacity errors of 12.36 and 7.28 mAh, respectively. On Dataset I, cross-expert fusion reduces both mean errors relative to either standalone expert. The proposed framework achieves the lowest reported RUL RMSE among the compared methods on both datasets while maintaining competitive capacity-estimation accuracy.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.