This paper presents a cross-expert framework using partial-charging measurements without requiring measured historical full-cycle capacity as an input, which achieves the lowest reported RUL RMSE among the compared methods on both datasets while maintaining competitive capacity-estimation accuracy.
Abstract
Joint remaining useful life (RUL) prediction and capacity estimation require representations of both gradual degradation and recent battery behavior. This paper presents a cross-expert framework using partial-charging measurements without requiring measured historical full-cycle capacity as an input. The RUL Expert captures long-term degradation from nominal 10-min segments sampled across a 30-cycle history, while the Capacity Expert characterizes recent battery behavior from statistical descriptors of nominal 40-min segments over ten consecutive cycles. Their complementary representations are integrated through feature-wise linear modulation for joint RUL and capacity prediction. A key contribution is a three-stage training strategy that progressively controls frozen and trainable components: supervised representation pretraining, independent expert pretraining, and final fusion training with both experts frozen. This staged optimization preserves expert-specific degradation knowledge while improving the balance between the two prediction tasks, with RUL treated as the primary prognostic objective. On two public battery-aging datasets, the reference configuration achieves mean RUL root-mean-square errors of 143.69 and 161.10 cycles and capacity errors of 12.36 and 7.28 mAh, respectively. On Dataset I, cross-expert fusion reduces both mean errors relative to either standalone expert. The proposed framework achieves the lowest reported RUL RMSE among the compared methods on both datasets while maintaining competitive capacity-estimation accuracy.
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60
An algorithm is proposed which leverages disentangled semantic factors to generate adversarial perturbation by altering controlled semantic attributes to fool the learner towards various "adversarial" targets.
Haonan Qiu, Chaowei Xiao, Lei Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 208 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.