Skip to content

TVGL-CFM:Generating and Forecasting Time-Varying Trajectories of Dynamic Networks with Conditional Flow Matching

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.16894 · 0 citations · 84 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

TVGL-CFM is introduced, a unified generative framework that learns distributions over complete SPD precision-matrix trajectories without requiring a pre-specified graph, supporting both class-conditional generation and history-conditioned forecasting and opening new possibilities for generative dynamic graph models.

Abstract

Many complex systems, including brain networks, financial markets, and gene-regulatory circuits, are better described by interaction structures that evolve over time than by a single fixed graph. The time-varying graphical lasso (TVGL) estimates this structure from multivariate signals as a temporally coherent sequence of sparse precision matrices. We introduce TVGL-CFM, a unified generative framework that learns distributions over complete SPD precision-matrix trajectories without requiring a pre-specified graph, supporting both class-conditional generation and history-conditioned forecasting. An SPD trajectory with T windows lies on the product Riemannian manifold (S++^p)^T. We construct a global log-Euclidean diffeomorphism from this product space to a Euclidean sequence space, enabling a non-autoregressive conditional flow-matching model with a Transformer backbone to generate all windows jointly and decode them to SPD matrices without post-hoc projection. For forecasting, we use two distinct data-dependent couplings so that the flow transforms an informative prior into a coherent future block. Across EEG motor-imagery data and three nonlinear dynamical systems, TVGL-CFM preserves class-discriminative dependency structure and forecasts future connectivity more accurately than several strongly matched baselines, opening new possibilities for generative dynamic graph models.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.