Aug 2026· Manchester School· Vol 94, pp. 629-641· 0 citations· 11 references
Abstract
We revisit the inverted‐U relationship between finance and growth using data for 40 countries from 1969 to 2019. Our estimates of the tipping point—the level of credit‐to‐GDP above which additional credit becomes a drag on growth—are substantially lower than those we reported in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. Why is this? Our analysis points to global factors as the most important determinant of the turning point. That is, we show that common movements in GDP and credit across countries significantly lower the estimated turning point. We go on to investigate the impact of banking‐system concentration, which raises the turning point but steepens the costs of exceeding it; bank credit‐to‐deposit ratios, which tend to lower it; and, most strikingly, the stock market capitalisation, where a high level can cause the inverted‐U to disappear entirely, so that additional bank credit is associated with lower growth at all levels.
The implementation of post-crisis (Basel III) capital requirements in 2015, followed by the introduction of the banking tax in 2016, marked a turning point for the loan-to-GDP ratio in Poland. Since Q4 2015, this ratio has declined by almost one-third, while the ratio of banks’ assets to GDP has remained relatively sta...
M. Czaplicki· Journal of Banking and Finan...· 0 citations
This paper studies how changes in interest rates affect borrowing cost, profitability and investment decisions. It also checks, at a descriptive level, whether Indian inflation and policy-rate data for 2010-2020 support the Fisher Effect. The two company cases are constructed examples, so they are used to explain mecha...
Shauryaa Goel· International Journal of Sci...· 0 citations