This essay aimed to critically examine the widely held claim in contemporary Arabic linguistic research that European structuralism decisively transformed the study of Arabic grammar. To this end, a qualitative, analytical, and historical-comparative approach was adopted, based on a critical analysis of primary sources of European structuralism—primarily the works of Ferdinand de Saussure, Leonard Bloomfield, and Roman Jakobson—as well as the classical and modern Arabic grammatical tradition, represented by Sibawayh's Al-Kitāb and Tammam Hassan's work on the theory of convergence of clues (taḍāfur al-qarāʾin). The analysis was supplemented by recent scholarly literature on Arabic linguistics, structuralism, functionalism, and cognitive linguistics. The results showed that structuralism's main contribution lay not in offering new knowledge about the Arabic language, but in introducing a different epistemological criterion for evaluating the validity of linguistic explanations. This approach allowed for the identification of limitations in the classical theory of ʿāmil, although Hassan's alternative proposal also failed to conclusively resolve these difficulties when subjected to the same level of critical analysis. It is concluded that the influence of structuralism on Arabic grammar has been more methodological than theoretical, and that much of the existing literature consists of pedagogical reinterpretations rather than empirically verified developments
This study examines the contributions of major Andalusian grammarians to the development of Arabic grammatical thought. Employing a qualitative library research design and a descriptive-analytical approach within the framework of the history of linguistic thought, the study analyzes the grammatical perspectives of Ibn Maḍāʾ al-Qurṭubī, Ibn ʿUṣfūr al-Ishbīlī, Ibn Mālik al-Jayyānī, Abū Ḥayyān al-Andalusī, and al-Shalawbinī. The findings reveal that Andalusian scholars played a significant role not only in preserving earlier grammatical traditions but also in enriching them through reform, methodological refinement, systematization of grammatical knowledge, critical evaluation of linguistic evidence, and independent interpretation. These contributions demonstrate the intellectual vitality of the Andalusian grammatical tradition and its influence on the evolution of Arabic grammar. The study concludes that Al-Andalus emerged as an important center of grammatical scholarship whose legacy continues to shape Arabic linguistic studies.
Furqan Muhammad Furqan Annajmie· Journal of Arabic Teaching,...· 0 citations
The article addresses the problem of crosslinguistic comparison of verbo-nominal stable collocations that occupy an intermediate position between free word combinations and phraseological units. The material includes scholarly works on contrastive linguistics and studies of these constructions in Germanic studies and Russian studies. It is established that linguistics lacks both a comprehensive picture of the functioning of these units and a universal system of criteria for delimiting them from adjacent phenomena. It is found that existing methods of contrastive analysis prove ineffective for their comparison. The aim of the study is to identify a prospective methodology for the comparative description of verbo-nominal predicative collocations in divergent languages (on the material of German and Russian). The relevance of the research is determined by the special significance of cross-linguistic studies for language pedagogy, lexicography, and natural language processing. The novelty lies in combining the principles of contrastive linguistics and typology. A methodology is proposed that combines unidirectional comparative analysis with reliance on a set of typological parameters as a specifically constructed benchmark for comparison. It is proven that this approach overcomes limitations associated with the intermediate status of the studied units, which creates a basis for conducting contrastive studies on other languages and improving machine algorithms.
This article investigates the semantic evolution of the lexeme qatyn in Kazakh from an originally respectful designation for a married woman to a socially marked, often pejorative label. Drawing on historical dictionaries, early Kazakh texts, Old Turkic inscriptions, and contemporary media discourse, the study combines methods of historical lexicology, etymological analysis, and sociolinguistic interpretation. The analysis systematizes competing etymologies that derive qatyn from Old Turkic qatun and from internal Turkic word-formation, and relates them to cultural models of marriage, kinship, and social hierarchy. Particular attention is paid to the role of Soviet-era language policy, purism, and ideological regulation of public discourse in shifting the evaluative profile of the word, as well as to the continuing coexistence of respectful and pejorative uses in present-day Kazakh. The paper argues that the semantic degradation of qatyn is not the result of purely internal linguistic change, but reflects broader transformations in gender ideology, urbanization, and the reconfiguration of Kazakh–Russian bilingual practices. By tracing micro-level changes in collocations, phraseology, and genre distribution, the article demonstrates how a key element of the Kazakh kinship lexicon has become a site where issues of linguistic correctness, national identity, and gendered respectability are negotiated.
Sherubay Kurmanbaiuly, M. Adilov, G. Alimbek et al.· Theory and Practice in Langu...· 0 citations
This study examines the historical development of Arabic linguistics and explores the contribution of medieval Azerbaijani scholars to the discipline. Using historical and descriptive methods, it traces the evolution of Arabic linguistics from its emergence in response to the need to preserve the correct recitation and interpretation of the Holy Qur'an to its establishment as an independent field of scholarship. Particular attention is given to the formation of Arabic grammatical thought, the intellectual influence of the Basran and Kufan schools, and the expansion of linguistic studies into grammar, morphology, lexicography, and philology. The study also examines the scholarly activities of Khaṭīb al-Tabrīzī, al-Zanjānī, and al-Ardabīlī, emphasizing their contributions to grammatical scholarship, philological interpretation, Arabic language teaching, and the preservation of the classical linguistic tradition. The findings indicate that medieval Azerbaijani scholars played an important role not only in transmitting existing linguistic knowledge but also in its systematization and further development. Their scholarly legacy constitutes an integral part of the history of Arabic philology and reflects the broader intellectual heritage of medieval Islamic civilization.
Konul Shimiyeva· Akademik tarih ve düşünce de...· 0 citations
The article examines the word-formation mechanisms and usage patterns of animal and bird names presented in the textbook
Oqu quraly
(1927), authored by A. Baitursynuly and T. Shonanuly. Based on empirical linguistic data, the study demonstrates that Kazakh intellectuals of the early twentieth century not only developed terminology for various scientific domains but also created Kazakh equivalents for animal species not native to the Kazakh steppe. The study identifies and analyzes selected lexical units, determines their word-formation models, and establishes which of them function as Kazakh equivalents of borrowed concepts. It further distinguishes between author-specific nominations and those that have entered the general lexical system of the Kazakh language. A comparative analysis is conducted between the early 20th-century coinages and their later standardized forms currently in use. Particular attention is paid to calquing as a dominant strategy in naming animal species inhabiting different continents, including America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia. The findings demonstrate that the creation of animal and bird names constitutes a significant dimension of early Kazakh intellectuals’ lexical innovation and contributes to the development of national scientific terminology. It was concluded that, during this period, calquing began to be actively used in Kazakh linguistics as a method of word formation. Based on specific linguistic data drawn from the works of prominent scholars, the creation of Kazakh names for birds, wild animals, and other fauna is comprehensively analyzed as a distinctive aspect of the lexical creativity of the Kazakh intelligentsia, and the main reasons for this phenomenon are identified. It is noted that the linguists Akhmet Baitursynuly and Telzhan Shonanuly, when creating new words and terms in educational materials, as well as when translating and writing borrowed words and terms, were guided by the scientific principles approved at the 1924 Congress of Kazakh Educators.