These findings identify synaptic delay as a key parameter governing the balance between phase resetting and amplitude modulation and provide a computational framework for understanding delay-dependent control of oscillatory brain networks.
Abstract
Synaptic delays are fundamental determinants of neuronal communication and can profoundly influence the emergence and stability of cortical oscillations. Although their role in shaping network synchronization is well established, how synaptic delays regulate the collective response of neuronal populations to transient perturbations remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate the effects of synaptic delays on the phase and amplitude responses of oscillatory activity in a conductance-based excitatory-inhibitory spiking network operating in the pyramidal-interneuron gamma (PING) regime. By systematically varying the synaptic delay and applying brief external perturbations to the excitatory population, inhibitory population, or the entire network, we computed network phase response curves (nPRCs) and network amplitude response curves (nARCs) to quantify changes in oscillation timing and population coherence. Increasing synaptic delay slowed network oscillations while enhancing population synchrony, demonstrating a trade-off between oscillation frequency and coherence. Excitatory perturbations produced relatively robust phase responses across delays but exhibited a pronounced delay-dependent reduction in amplitude enhancement. In contrast, inhibitory perturbations generated substantially stronger delay-dependent modulation of both phase resetting and amplitude suppression, whereas whole-network stimulation combined features of both excitatory and inhibitory responses. Taken toghether, these findings identify synaptic delay as a key parameter governing the balance between phase resetting and amplitude modulation and provide a computational framework for understanding delay-dependent control of oscillatory brain networks.
Oscillatory neuronal networks exhibit complex collective responses to external perturbations that depend on both the intrinsic network dynamics and the timing of stimulation. Although phase response curves (PRCs) have become a standard tool for characterizing these responses, phase resetting alone provides an incomplet...
Determining the amount of information a neuron receives per unit of time is key to understanding brain connectivity and how neural networks encode and transmit information. In particular, estimating this information flow by distinguishing between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic contributions is critical to understan...
R. M. Delicado-Moll, A. Guillamón, A. E. Teruel et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Astrocytes are increasingly recognized as active regulators of neural dynamics, yet their role in large-scale synchronization remains incompletely understood. Building on the discovery of breathing cluster synchronization in neuron-astrocyte networks, we investigate whether this phenomenon persists under more biologica...
Ediline L. F. Nguessap, Thierry Njougouo, F. F. Ferreira· 0 citations
Anticipated synchronization (AS), in which the receiver leads the sender and the phase lag is negative, can emerge in unidirectionally coupled dynamical systems when the receiver has faster internal dynamics than the sender. In cortical-like population models, AS and bistability between AS and delayed synchronization (...
J. N. Machado, Joana M G L Silva, Katiele V P Brito et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.