Efficacy and diabetes risk of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aug 2026· Journal of Clinical Lipidology· 0 citations· 27 references
Medicine
TL;DR
It is suggested that moderate-intensity statin therapy combined with ezetimibe provides cardiovascular protection equivalent to high-intensity statin therapy, while significantly reducing the risk of new-onset diabetes in patients undergoing PCI.
Abstract
Background
Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have a high cardiovascular risk. Current guidelines recommend a ≥50% low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction from baseline. Notably, the recently published 2026 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Multisociety Dyslipidemia Guideline continues to support >50% LDL-C reduction while reinstating specific LDL-C targets for very high-risk patients. Statins are widely used to achieve these goals; however, higher-intensity therapy has been associated with adverse effects, including new-onset diabetes mellitus through mechanisms that may include impaired insulin sensitivity, reduced insulin secretion, and altered adipokine signaling. The combination of ezetimibe with a moderate-intensity statin may offer an effective lipid-lowering strategy with fewer metabolic side effects.
Objective
This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and risk of diabetes in patients receiving moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe vs high-intensity statin therapy after PCI.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through July 18, 2025. Relative risks (RR) with 95% CIs were estimated using random-effects or fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I² statistic. Analyses were performed in RStudio 4.4.2.
Results
Seven studies, including 121,480 patients, were analyzed. Of these, 26,228 (21.5%) received moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe, and 95,252 (78.4%) received high-intensity statins. The moderate-intensity group showed a lower risk of new-onset diabetes requiring medication (RR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.76-0.91), and all-cause mortality favors moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.95). No significant differences were observed in major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.65-1.52) or revascularization (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.83-1.12).
Conclusion
This meta-analysis suggests that moderate-intensity statin therapy combined with ezetimibe provides cardiovascular protection equivalent to high-intensity statin therapy, while significantly reducing the risk of new-onset diabetes in patients undergoing PCI.
High-risk dyslipidemia is a treatment problem defined less by an isolated cholesterol value than by the interaction between atherogenic lipoprotein burden and absolute cardiovascular risk. This structured narrative review examines contemporary lipid targets, the role of high-intensity statins, and the place of newer li...
F. D. de Souza, Laura Leme de Araújo Rodrigues da Silva, Nicolas Victor Camargo Chon et al.· International Health Science...· 0 citations
Moderate-intensity rosuvastatin combined with ezetimibe achieved lipid-lowering efficacy comparable to high-intensity rosuvastatin while producing lower relative increases in liver enzymes over 24 weeks, suggesting that combination therapy represents a reasonable therapeutic alternative for selected patients requiring...
Nourhan K. Elsaeed, Refaat H. Abdelmoety, Ehab Elyamani et al.· Future Journal of Pharmaceut...· 0 citations
This expert position paper proposes practical algorithms for a precision medicine approach in Latin America, matching treatment intensity to individual risk profiles for the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
C. Ponte-Negretti, A. Lorenzatti, Fernando S. Wyss-Quintana et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
Upfront dual therapy with atorvastatin (80 mg) and ezetimibe (10 mg) achieved robust LDL‑C reduction with low interindividual variability in treatment-naive individuals, which supports current guideline recommendations for immediate combination therapy in very high-risk patients, irrespective of their baseline metaboli...
U. Makhmudova, D. Lütjohann, F. Haertel et al.· Herz· 0 citations
Objective: To evaluate lipid-lowering therapy patterns and the attainment of guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) goals among high and very high-risk patients with diabetes mellitus in a real-world clinical setting.Material and Methods:...
Objective: To compare two lipid-lowering therapy strategies involving Ezetimibe and Alirocumab on the vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaque (AP) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) not achieving the LDL-cholesterol target while on intensive statin therapy. Methods: Combi-LLT-ACS (Patients receiving combina...
A. Kovalskaya, G. Bikbaeva, D. Duplyakov et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.