Skip to content
Open access

Safety and efficacy of low-density lipoprotein-lowering drugs in the elderly: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Aug 2026 · Journal of Geriatric Cardiology · Vol 23 8, pp. 515-528 · 0 citations · 33 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Moderate-intensity pitavastatin showed the highest safety profile, while its combination with ezetimibe was the most effective for LDL reduction, suggesting greater efficacy in primary prevention.

Abstract

Background

Balancing the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction with safety presents a significant challenge in the elderly care. While guidelines recommended high-intensity statins as the optimal strategy to lower LDL in high-risk individuals, there are prevailing concerns regarding its side effects and subsequent fatality rate. The effectiveness of different LDL-lowering therapies in this population is also unclear. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of various LDL-lowering strategies in elderly population.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted through six databases until March 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate LDL-lowering agents were included. The primary outcome was adverse effects, while secondary outcomes included composite cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, CVD related mortality, all-cause mortality, and LDL level reduction. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 tool. A network meta-analyses were performed to compare the safety and efficacy with subgroup analysis based on underlying CVD under the cumulative ranking values.

Results

Sixteen RCTs (n = 43,625) with low to moderate risk of bias were included. Among interventions evaluated for adverse events, moderate-intensity pitavastatin had the highest probability of being the safest. Ezetimibe demonstrated the most favorable safety profile for reducing CVD mortality, while evolocumab was most effective in lowering all-cause mortality. For LDL reduction, the combination of moderate-intensity pitavastatin and ezetimibe was the most effective, followed by moderate-intensity rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe. Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences between CVD and non-CVD populations in CVD mortality (P = 0.0059), CVD events (P = 0.0096), and LDL reduction (P = 0.0100), with more pronounced effects in the non-CVD group, suggesting greater efficacy in primary prevention.

Conclusions

Moderate-intensity pitavastatin showed the highest safety profile, while its combination with ezetimibe was the most effective for LDL reduction.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Non‐Statin Lipid‐Lowering Therapies in Dyslipidaemia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT Introduction Dyslipidaemia remains a major contributor to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and many patients fail to achieve recommended low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) targets despite statin therapy or are unable to tolerate statins. Oral non‐statin therapies have emerged as importa...

Tamer Hodrob, Reem J. Saad, Aya Hamdy et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

High-Risk Dyslipidemia: Lipid targets, high-intensity statins, and novel lipid-lowering agents

High-risk dyslipidemia is a treatment problem defined less by an isolated cholesterol value than by the interaction between atherogenic lipoprotein burden and absolute cardiovascular risk. This structured narrative review examines contemporary lipid targets, the role of high-intensity statins, and the place of newer li...

F. D. de Souza, Laura Leme de Araújo Rodrigues da Silva, Nicolas Victor Camargo Chon et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Safety and tolerability of nonstatin LDL-cholesterol-lowering therapies: A systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND Nonstatin low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol-lowering therapies are increasingly used in secondary prevention, familial hypercholesterolemia, and statin-intolerant patients, but adverse-event reporting is heterogeneous, and harmonized safety evidence remains limited. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the tolera...

A. Matteucci, M. Bonanni, S. D. Di Fusco et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

GUIDELINE-DIRECTED LIPID GOAL ATTAINMENT IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES AT HIGH AND VERY HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK: REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE OF A PROFOUND TREATMENT GAP

Objective: To evaluate lipid-lowering therapy patterns and the attainment of guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) goals among high and very high-risk patients with diabetes mellitus in a real-world clinical setting.Material and Methods:...

Tolga Aydin · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Effect of a ≥50% Reduction in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol From Baseline in Patients With Ischemic Stroke.

A substantial proportion of patients with ischemic stroke fail to achieve optimal LDL-C reduction; thus, more intensive and multifaceted lipid-lowering strategies focusing on both absolute and relative LDL-C reduction may lead to improved long-term outcomes.

M. Baik, Jimin Jeon, Joonsang Yoo et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.