Skip to content
Open access

AI Governance Engineering: A Framework for Secure, Explainable, and Trustworthy Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Systems

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Research Publications · 0 citations

TL;DR

This paper argues for a transition from AI Governance as Compliance to AI Governance Engineering , a systems-oriented discipline in which governance is embedded throughout the enterprise intelligence lifecycle, enabling enterprise intelligence systems that are secure, explainable, trustworthy, and governable by design.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence has evolved from a collection of analytical technologies into an operational capability that increasingly shapes enterprise decision-making, business processes, and strategic management. Organizations now deploy Large Language Models, AI agents, predictive analytics, and intelligent automation across critical operations. While these technologies expand organizational capabilities, they also introduce governance challenges that cannot be addressed solely through traditional security controls or regulatory compliance. Existing approaches largely treat governance as an external oversight function rather than an integral component of enterprise system architecture. This paper argues for a transition from AI Governance as Compliance to AI Governance Engineering , a systems-oriented discipline in which governance is embedded throughout the enterprise intelligence lifecycle. Rather than governing isolated AI models, the proposed approach governs how Artificial Intelligence is accessed, how knowledge is utilized, how decisions are formed, how risks are managed, and how human oversight is maintained. To support this perspective, the study introduces the AI Governance Engineering Framework (AIGEF) , consisting of seven architectural layers: Identity and Access Governance, Knowledge Governance, Decision Policy Management, Explainability and Transparency, Risk and Trust Evaluation, Governance Orchestration, and Continuous Governance Learning. Together, these components transform governance from a compliance activity into an operational capability that actively participates in enterprise reasoning. The framework introduces decision-level governance , where the primary object of governance is the organizational decision process rather than the AI model itself. The framework is further informed by enterprise AI implementations addressing governance challenges in infrastructure management, decision-support environments, and industrial AI systems. These implementations demonstrate that trustworthy enterprise AI requires governance mechanisms supporting transparent reasoning, human oversight, adaptive risk management, and organizational accountability. The study concludes that trustworthy enterprise AI cannot be achieved solely through more accurate models or stricter regulations. Instead, governance must become an architectural capability embedded throughout the decision lifecycle, enabling enterprise intelligence systems that are secure, explainable, trustworthy, and governable by design.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Responsible AI Architecture in Enterprise Modernization: Governance Frameworks, Equity Implications, and Regulatory Convergence

This article examines three interconnected dimensions of responsible AI for enterprise modernization: governance infrastructure for accountable AI deployment, algorithmic equity in high-impact decision environments, and the evolving international regulatory landscape shaping enterprise AI governance.

M. Modi · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Addressing the Artificial Intelligence Governance Gap in Environmental, Social, and Governance Standards

It is argued that ESG frameworks, which evolved through incremental adjustment, may prove insufficient for governing algorithmic systems and proposed adding a fourth pillar, Algorithmic Governance, within an extended ESGA framework to address risks that transcend traditional governance categories.

Pitabas Mohanty, Supriti Mishra · 0 citations
Open access 2026

AI-Driven Oversight in Multi-Sector Governance Systems: A Cross-Domain Analysis of Adaptive AI-Enabled Governance

The model demonstrates how AI can serve as a governance augmentation layer, generating decision-support intelligence, generating decision-support intelligence, accelerating operational awareness, enhancing adaptive oversight, and supporting real-time governance recalibration.

Dr. Robb Shawe · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Physical AI Governance: From Theory to Practice Across Life Cycle

With the emergence of Physical AI, artificial intelligence is extending beyond screen-based applications to embodied systems that perceive, interact with, and act in the physical world. Unlike traditional AI, Physical AI operates under real-time safety constraints, continuously interacts with dynamic environments, and coexists with humans, introducing governance challenges that existing AI governance frameworks do not explicitly address. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of Physical AI governance from both scientific and operational perspectives. We synthesize existing governance principles and organize them into a unified governance framework tailored to physical AI systems. Building on this foundation, we propose a five-stage Physical AI lifecycle comprising research, design, data, model development, and deployment, and demonstrate how governance can be operationalized across each stage through concrete implementation practices. By connecting governance principles with engineering workflows, this survey provides a structured reference for researchers, developers, and policymakers to build Physical AI systems that are safe, trustworthy, and aligned with societal values.

Wang Yang, Shaojuan Wang, Hong-Xuan Liu et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Jul 2026

Collaborative Governance and Algorithmic Accountability: Regulating Risks and Restructuring Organizations for AI Integration

The widespread application of artificial intelligence (AI) in corporate resource planning and public decision-making has provided impetus for improving management efficiency and creating social value. However, the complex structure and opacity of algorithms have led to a crisis of trust, posing challenges to traditional public management accountability mechanisms. Drawing on socio-technical systems theory, this paper provides a normative analysis of thirteen recent studies on the challenges of technology implementation, ethical trust, and legal regulation. The findings suggest that the current governance dilemma stems not only from technological limitations but also from institutional neglect, which enables accountability avoidance. Although the EU AI Act proposes a preliminary form of collaborative governance, it still has shortcomings in terms of procedural justice and the feasibility of human oversight. The governance logic should shift from individual oversight to an organization-in-the-loop approach, to achieve sustainable and responsible AI governance through the construction of a procedural justice framework.

Xiaoran Ma · 0 citations