Skip to content

EvoRank: LLM-Guided Evolution of Multi-Objective Learning-to-Rank Pipelines

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 25 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

EvoRank is presented, an open autonomous ranking engineer: an LLM-guided evolutionary loop that discovers complete Learning-to-Rank pipelines (features, models, losses, ensembles) for multi-objective e-commerce search and is released as a headroom gate that predicts, before any LLM spend, whether the loop will pay off.

Abstract

We present EvoRank, an open autonomous ranking engineer: an LLM-guided evolutionary loop that discovers complete Learning-to-Rank pipelines (features, models, losses, ensembles) for multi-objective e-commerce search. On the Expedia ICDM 2013 dataset, with relevance, conversion, and revenue as competing objectives, three independent runs each converge within 50 iterations (about ten dollars) on interpretable pipelines that beat an Optuna-tuned LambdaMART on 60k held-out queries, an advantage that persists at full data scale and places in the top 6 percent of the original competition. A first campaign, evolving only training objectives, builds the central design rule: it appeared to work on its selection fold (the small dataset it uses to pick winners) while a transfer audit, re-scoring winners on held-out data, showed the gains were almost entirely fitness noise (the randomness of its own scoring), and neither seeded domain knowledge nor richer diagnostic feedback changed what transferred. The deciding quantity is measurable in advance: search-space headroom relative to fitness noise. We package this as a headroom gate that predicts, before any LLM spend, whether the loop will pay off, and we release the system, the auditing tools, and a catalog of failure modes with their guardrails, so teams can apply the procedure to their own ranking stacks.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

EvE: An Alternate Optimizer to Adam

EvE (Evolutionary Explorer), a steady-state, population-of-four differential evolution (DE) optimizer with a targeted Adam fallback: each iteration proposes one candidate via DE, running a short burst of gradient descent only if the DE step fails to improve on the incumbent.

Shashank Raj, Kalyanmoy Deb · 0 citations

Clustering-based Prompt Optimization for LLM Evaluation

The cluster loop yields the strongest held-out rubric on both evaluator tasks from a commercial search vertical, and is the only method robustly positive on both.

Jinyoung Kim, N. Corp, Sun Kim et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Evolutionary Soups: Evolving Mixture-of-Experts for Multi-Objective LLM Alignment

Evolutionary Soups, a mixture-of-experts framework for fine-grained generation control, with gating networks trained via an evolutionary algorithm, achieves the best hypervolume, linear utility, and Tchebyshev utility among controllable methods on all tasks.

Lingxiao Kong, Steffen Staab, Cong Yang et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

LLMs as Feature Engineers for Text-and-Tabular Prediction

An iterative framework that automates the extraction of interpretable, schema-bound categorical features from unstructured text for tabular prediction models that guarantees instance-level interpretability and provides a fully transparent, semantic audit trail for every prediction.

Merwan Barlier, Blaž Škrlj · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Post-Training Science for Supervised Fine-Tuning

This work asks how the optimal learning rate and batch size move with model scale, family, and data, and whether one selection rule transfers across them; what LoRA trades against full fine-tuning, and how its rank and alpha set what the adapter can learn; whether validation loss faithfully ranks downstream quality.

Charles O'Neill, M. Jayasekara, Harry B. Partridge · 1 citation

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.