Overall, these results show that first-layer localization can provide measurable improvements to baseline PINNs on long-domain and high-order problems.
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) use one shared representation over the computational domain, which can become difficult to optimize on long domains and for high-order operators. We study a minimal alternative: multiply the first hidden activation of an otherwise unchanged dense PINN by input-dependent localization functions, giving first-layer units receptive fields without partitioning the domain or adding interface losses. We screen 13 families of localization functions, in up to three parameterizations each, on a nonlinear harmonic oscillator (HO), a heat equation on a long spatial interval, and a manufactured four-dimensional (4D) fourth-order problem, with ten paired seeds throughout. Three configurations give large reductions in solution error at matched budgets: (i) Fixed Gaussian localization functions on the $2\pi$ HO domain cut mean solution RMSE from $4.8369\times10^{-1}$ to $8.83\times10^{-3}$ at 3k epochs. (ii) The inverse-quadratic family with learnable centers and widths cuts it from $2.896\times10^{-1}$ to $3.06\times10^{-2}$ on the $8\pi$ heat domain at 10k epochs. (iii) Fixed bump localization functions cut it from $1.75947\times10^{1}$ to $2.260\times10^{-1}$ on the $4\pi$ 4D domain at 10k epochs. Every paired seed improves in these three comparisons. The screen also shows that the mechanism is not a free win: on HO only 2 of 13 families beat the baseline, and 10 of the remaining 11 are 9 to 23 times worse; on 4D four families are non-finite and five are more than three orders of magnitude worse than the baseline. The inverse-quadratic family is the only one that beats the baseline on all three equations. Overall, these results show that first-layer localization can provide measurable improvements to baseline PINNs on long-domain and high-order problems.
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60
An algorithm is proposed which leverages disentangled semantic factors to generate adversarial perturbation by altering controlled semantic attributes to fool the learner towards various "adversarial" targets.
Haonan Qiu, Chaowei Xiao, Lei Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 208 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.