A context-aware, multi-agent framework that integrates textual queries, numerical data, visual representations, and model-derived signals for explainable time-series forecasting, which argues makes the approach a natural foundation for non-visual, accessible interaction of particular relevance to blind and visually impaired users.
Abstract
Multimodal large language models are increasingly used in interactive systems, yet ensuring consistent, trustworthy reasoning across heterogeneous modalities remains challenging. We present a context-aware, multi-agent framework that integrates textual queries, numerical data, visual representations, and model-derived signals for explainable time-series forecasting. A distinctive feature is that it turns predominantly visual forecasting outputs (e.g., trend plots) into structured, model-aware textual explanations. We argue that this makes the approach a natural foundation for non-visual, accessible interaction of particular relevance to blind and visually impaired users, for whom plot-centric interfaces are largely inaccessible. The framework supports three progressively richer pipelines (baseline, interpretable, explainable), enabling systematic comparison of unimodal, perception-driven, and model-aware responses. In an exploratory evaluation using an LLM-based judge as an early-stage proxy for human assessment, the explainable configuration improves overall explanation quality by up to 32% over a numerical baseline, with notable gains in trustworthiness and model awareness. We position user-centered validation with target users, including screen-reader and speech-interface users, as the essential next step rather than a claim established here.
Evaluating representative proprietary and open-source multimodal models, it is found that visual reasoning is strongly model- and environment-dependent, with no single setting consistently dominating across tasks.
Siyu Yan, Zhuoran Yan, Haiying Xu et al.· 0 citations
Unified multimodal models (UMMs) with interleaved reasoning, which generate both textual and visual steps as part of intermediate reasoning traces, have demonstrated great potential for visual mathematical reasoning tasks. However, we identify a key insight in this paradigm: generating intermediate visual reasoning steps is not always beneficial and can even be harmful, as self-generated visual steps may introduce erroneous visual evidence that misleads subsequent reasoning. Moreover, frequently triggering visual steps during reasoning incurs substantial computational and memory overhead, degrading inference efficiency. To address these accuracy and efficiency challenges, we observe that the model's internal signals can indicate whether a visual step will benefit reasoning before the entire visual generation is completed. Specifically, this work identifies two internal signals: 1) Generation Intent, which reflects whether the model has a concrete textual plan for what to draw, and 2) Visual Fidelity, which measures whether the visual generation remains grounded in the original input image. Leveraging these internal signals, we propose AdaViG, a training-free adaptive visual gating method for unified multimodal reasoning. AdaViG dynamically evaluates each triggered visual step at an early visual generation stage and aborts it when both signals are weak, thereby preventing misleading visual evidence from entering the reasoning trace while avoiding unnecessary computation. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that AdaViG improves accuracy by up to 5.7% while reducing visual generation FLOPs by 25.0%-91.0% and wall-clock latency by 15.4%-45.6%.
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) capable of thinking with images often rely on external tools for fine-grained perception. However, this reliance introduces significant inference latency and fails to effectively resolve the spatial-structural gap-a fundamental challenge in text-dense and structurally relational visuals (e.g., charts and visual tables) where strict relative spatial arrangements bind textual elements. Without external tools, standard MLLMs struggle with such fine-grained visual reasoning tasks. To address these issues, we propose Think with Structured Grounding (TwSG), a novel fine-grained image perception framework designed to internalize complex images's tool-use capabilities within the model. TwSG distills the benefits of multi-step reasoning and micro-cropping into a single efficient forward pass during inference. Specifically, we use an MLLM to identify key regions guided by ground-truth answers, and then prompt a teacher model to generate high-quality visual question-answering (VQA) data. These fine-grained, region-based supervisory signals are subsequently distilled back into the full-image representation. Our training pipeline consists of two stages: (1) a cold-start supervised fine-tuning (SFT) phase using multi-turn data with focused area descriptions to foster complex reasoning and error recovery; and (2) a reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) phase driven by a novel process reward mechanism, TL-GRPO, which encourages strategic reasoning. Extensive experiments across various MLLM architectures demonstrate that TwSG reduces inference latency while substantially improving accuracy and robustness, endowing models with native fine-grained region description and flexible reasoning capabilities.
Changjiang Jiang, Qiannian Zhao, Lei Xin et al.· 0 citations
ProVisE (Protocolized Visual Evaluation), a benchmark-agnostic framework that elicits protocol-constrained visual answers from image-generation models and parses them into structured predictions compatible with original metrics, is proposed and revealed, revealing complementary strengths of pixel-space expression and text-based reasoning.
Xu Wang, Kaixiang Yao, Miao Pan et al.· 1 citation
Vision Language Models have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in interpreting static visual artifacts, but modern data analysis is inherently dynamic, requiring the active interrogation of interactive environments. Existing benchmarks are predominantly constrained to static imagery and one-shot question answering and fail to capture the epistemic demands of this domain, where evidence is frequently occluded, distributed across linked views, or conditionally revealed through user agency. In this paper, we introduce InSight, a benchmark for agentic claim verification over interactive visualizations. The dataset consists of 21,349 claims derived from human-authored analytical narratives and grounded in fully interactive web-based environments. Agents must navigate these environments to determine whether a natural language claim is supported, refuted or not verifiable given the available evidence. Unlike traditional evaluations, InSight treats interaction traces as intrinsic proxies for reasoning, enabling a rigorous audit of how models seek and synthesize visual evidence. We evaluate state-of-the-art models, revealing that interactive verification remains a non-trivial challenge. We release InSight at https://github.com/maevehutch/insight.
Maeve Hutchinson, Syed Mahbubul Huq, Mohammad Albinhassan et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces Spatially-Grounded Thought Tokenization to explicitly align special tokens with spatial locations for clear spatial correspondence and visual interpretability, and proposes Mixture-of-Thought-Tokens, a new free-form multimodal grounding method that bridges the perception-reasoning gap.
Tianyi Gao, Han Fang, Tianyi Ding et al.· 0 citations
