Skip to content

Beetle: A Bilingual Model Suite for Modelling Second-Language Processing

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 78 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Evaluating models on human bilingual and second language reading-time prediction and grammaticality judgement tasks, it is found that staged and temporally structured curricula consistently improve alignment with language learner reading time compared to balanced bilingual training.

Abstract

Bilingual language models (LMs) offer a controlled setting for studying how training conditions shape second-language (L2) behaviour, but prior work typically varies exposure structure, scale, and architecture at once, making it difficult to attribute effects to any single factor. We introduce Beetle, a controlled language model pretraining framework in which tokeniser, target language, training budget, and exposure structure are each independently manipulable, enabling systematic and comparable experimentation of training conditions. Using Beetle, we train and release 285 bilingual and 45 monolingual open-source LMs with rich checkpoints across a range of exposure schedules, data scales and first languages (L1s) to study multilingual pretraining and computational modelling of bilingualism and second language learning. Evaluating models on human bilingual and second language reading-time prediction and grammaticality judgement tasks, we find that staged and temporally structured curricula consistently improve alignment with language learner reading time compared to balanced bilingual training, with the largest gains at smaller data scales and for typologically closer language pairs. The Beetle models are well suited tools to help move computational psycholinguistics beyond its prevailing monolingual, English-centric focus toward models of human bilingual processing, to study cross-lingual learning dynamics, while supporting community-based development of controlled model families.

View source

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Assessing the Impact of Language Disparity on Multilingual Linguistic Ability in Large Language Models

Claims about the grammatical competence of multilingual language models vary sharply with how competence is measured, yet the interaction between evaluation paradigm, post-training, and language resource availability has not been systematically examined. We evaluate base and post-trained models from six families on Mul...

Zhan-Yu Chen, Jaap Jumelet · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Cross-Linguistic Effects in Bilingual Phoneme BabyLMs

Cross-linguistic effects are a central topic in bilingual first-language acquisition. Artificial learners can help investigate L1-L2 interactions by enabling controlled comparisons across language combinations and learning conditions. Recent work explores this direction by training bilingual language models under devel...

Nikitas Theodoropoulos, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

Language-Specific Effects of Tokenizer Choice in Multilingual Language Models

Tokenizer choice affects multilingual language modeling, but vocabulary capacity is finite and vocabulary size is often constrained: improving representation for some languages often comes at the expense of others. We therefore ask whether tokenizer choice matters equally across languages, a question that the current l...

Clara Meister, G. S. Altintas, Antoine Bosselut · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

One Form to Transfer Them All: Pretraining Multilingual Language Models Beyond Native Orthography

These results indicate that for multilingual models spanning typologically diverse scripts, to obtain maximum benefits, romanization should be treated as a core design choice applied at pretraining rather than a post hoc fix.

Mu-Ge Zhang, Aaron Jencks, Krishna Badikela et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Skill Issue: Are Skills Language-Invariant in LLMs?

This work quantifies cross-lingual skill inconsistency orthogonally from knowledge and general benchmark performance via multilingual self-play, and shows that skill discrepancies are a measurable major roadblock in the development of truly multilingual models.

Bobby Cheng, Adam Gaber, Zhengzhe Liu et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Cross-Lingual Alignment Without Joint Training: Do Monolingual Language Models Converge on Universal Representations?

It is confirmed that cross-lingual alignment can emerge from the structure of language and the information it carries rather than from joint training, and this points to practical future directions including model stitching, merging, and modular multilingual systems built from monolingual components.

Ej Zhou, Suchir Salhan, Catherine Arnett et al. · 1 citation

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 15, 2026

AI model decodes the language cells use to communicate

A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 15, 2026

Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar

Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 24, 2026

Estimating suicide risk from text

A new language-processing tool could help identify the highest-risk individuals from natural language, enabling swifter interventions.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.