A Global Comparison of Schemas, Transparency, and Interoperability in Public-Sector AI Registers and Inventories
TL;DR
A layered visibility framework is synthesized that shows how register records reflect disclosure arrangements and why interoperability requires shared concepts, clear definitions, and preserved provenance.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) registers and inventories aim to make governmental AI visible, but their institutional scope, schemas, and reporting practices construct different representations of public-sector AI. We compare 8,368 records from country-specific and transnational inventories covering 72 countries. Across 23 harmonized fields, registers shared a descriptive core but rarely requested information about appeals, risks, legal bases, or external evaluation. We found that broad schemas often contained substantial missingness, schema similarity showed no significant patterned convergence, and multiple sources covering the same jurisdictions overlapped only selectively. Based on these findings, we synthesize a layered visibility framework that shows how register records reflect disclosure arrangements and why interoperability requires shared concepts, clear definitions, and preserved provenance.
