Skip to content
Review

Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Stimulation Montages and Timing.

Aug 2026 · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · 0 citations
Medicine

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) initiated strictly within the acute ischemic stroke.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted via PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Outcomes included neurological deficit, upper limb and lower limb motor function, and functional independence. Data were synthesized using random-effects models to calculate weighted mean differences (WMD) and standardized mean differences (SMD).

Results

Ten RCTs involving 419 participants were included. Active tDCS significantly reduced neurological deficits compared to sham stimulation (WMD=-0.86, 95% CI: -1.38 to -0.34, P=0.001). While tDCS did not significantly improve short-term or long-term upper limb function, it demonstrated a significant improvement on lower limb motor recovery (SMD=3.50, 95% CI: 2.56 to 4.44, P<0.001), which was sustained at follow-up. No significant difference was found in functional independence or safety outcomes between groups.

Conclusions

tDCS initiated in the acute phase is safe and effective for reducing neurological deficits and enhancing lower limb motor recovery. The discrepancy between lower and upper limb outcomes suggests distinct neuroplastic mechanisms, highlighting the potential of tDCS, particularly bilateral montages, as a targeted intervention for early gait rehabilitation.

View source

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper extremity functional rehabilitation in stroke survivors: a meta-analysis of parallel randomized controlled trials

Adjuvant c-tDCS improves upper limb motor function, daily living activities, elbow spasticity, and global neurological status in stroke survivors, with favorable safety and short-term durability.

Jiangmei Chen, Li-Qiang Yu, Fang Liu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Completion rate and safety of non-invasive brain stimulation for upper limb dysfunction after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been widely used as an adjunctive intervention for upper limb motor recovery after stroke; however, the treatment completion rates and comparative safety profiles...

Juan Sun, Zi-Le Wang, Yi-Ming Huang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Current randomized evidence suggests that rTMS and tDCS may improve depressive symptoms in patients with PSD and appear generally well tolerated, however, the certainty of these findings is limited by substantial heterogeneity, small sample sizes in several trials, and variation in stimulation protocols.

Pei-Zhang Huang, Hao-Jie Wang, Chen Huang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Evaluation of the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in reducing upper limb spasticity in patients after stroke: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Introduction Spasticity is a common motor disorder that develops after stroke, negatively impacting motor control and functional capacity. Non-pharmacological methods, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are increasingly used in its treatment; however, the optimal stimulation protocol remains uncl...

Justyna Brożonowicz, Natalia Wołoszyn, J. Leszczak et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.