Skip to content
Review Open access

Prenatal screening and diagnostic strategies for fetal genetic abnormalities: Comparison of international clinical guidelines.

Aug 2026 · International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 1 citation · 15 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Although international guidelines show broad agreement regarding the importance of prenatal screening and confirmatory diagnostic testing, differences persist in the implementation of screening strategies and the integration of emerging genomic technologies.

Abstract

This study compares recommendations from international clinical guidelines regarding prenatal screening and diagnostic testing for fetal genetic abnormalities, including the role of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), invasive diagnostic procedures, and advanced genomic technologies. An integrative review was conducted in guidelines and consensus statements from international societies to compare recommendations regarding prenatal screening and diagnostic testing for fetal genetic abnormalities, including the role of NIPT, invasive diagnostic procedures, and advanced genomic technologies. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for guidelines published up to December 2025. Guidelines from major obstetrics and genetics societies were included. Findings were synthesized and compared qualitatively across guidelines. Nine international guidelines were included in the analysis. Most societies recommend offering prenatal screening for aneuploidy to all pregnant women. NIPT was consistently described as the most sensitive screening method for common aneuploidies, although not recommended as a diagnostic test. Invasive procedures, including amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling, remain the gold standard for diagnostic confirmation. Recommendations regarding advanced genomic testing varied, with chromosomal microarray generally recommended in cases of fetal structural anomalies, while routine prenatal exome sequencing remains limited to selected scenarios. Although international guidelines show broad agreement regarding the importance of prenatal screening and confirmatory diagnostic testing, differences persist in the implementation of screening strategies and the integration of emerging genomic technologies.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Prenatal Test Selection After First-Trimester Ultrasound Abnormalities Within a Centralized Genetic Counseling System in Japan.

It is suggested that the type of first-trimester ultrasound abnormality is associated with prenatal test selection, and the importance of individualized genetic counseling when discussing prenatal testing options and residual uncertainty following abnormal ultrasound findings is highlighted.

Koutarou Doi, Masatoshi Yamaguchi, Minayo Iwai et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Prenatal Genetic Screening and Embryonic Morphological Assessment for Early Detection of Developmental Abnormalities

Background: Developmental abnormalities are an important cause of fetal and neonatal morbidity, mortality, and long-term disability. Advances in prenatal genetic screening and high-resolution fetal imaging have improved opportunities for identifying chromosomal, genetic, and structural abnormalities during early pregna...

S. Malik · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Detection and Clinical Significance of Chromosomal Mosaicism in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study From a Prenatal Diagnosis Center

NIPT outperforms traditional serum screening for detecting chromosomal mosaicism, though karyotyping remains essential for confirmation, and CMA aligns well with karyotyping, particularly for low‐level mosaicism.

Yu-Heng Pei, Xiaojin Luo, Jianghua Ran et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Genetic Testing: Basic Principles for the Pediatrician

In this review, we describe current genetic testing modalities available for pediatricians, provide guidance on test selection and result interpretation, and inform providers on proper genetic testing consent practices. For each type of genetic test, details regarding types of mutations detected, limitations, and commo...

Jonathan B. Trapani, John A. Phillips, Scott K. Ward · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Genetic Investigation in Fetal Growth Restriction: An Integrated Approach for Clinical Practice.

International guidelines recommend genetic testing when fetal growth restriction (FGR) accompanies structural anomalies, but recommendations for apparently isolated FGR remain variable, particularly regarding gestational age thresholds and the role of exome sequencing (ES). Interpretation is difficult because studies d...

E. Ashwal, D. Chitayat · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

A Conceptual Roadmap toward Informed Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnostic Testing: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION Prenatal genetic screening and diagnostic tests (PS&D) are a core component of the delivery of high-quality, evidence-based prenatal care. There is a paucity of evidence on how to structure decision-making processes that are responsive to rapid advances in prenatal genetics, perinatology, and neonatology,...

Miller S. Finkelstein, John F. P. Bridges, Norah L. Crossnohere et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.