Skip to content

Reality Drift Tools: Evaluation, Diagnostics, and Governance for AI Systems

Sep 2026 · Figshare · 2 references
Data Stream Mining Techniques

Abstract

This collection presents three practical tools developed as part of the Semantic Fidelity Project for evaluating Reality Drift in artificial intelligence systems, including large language models, retrieval systems, and multi-step agent workflows.Reality Drift occurs when a system continues to operate coherently while gradually losing corrective contact with user intent, source conditions, operational context, or real-world outcomes. In production AI systems, this can occur without a conspicuous failure or major decline in benchmark performance. Outputs may remain fluent, consistent, and procedurally valid while becoming less faithful, useful, or responsive to the conditions they are meant to represent.The collection includes:Reality Drift Evaluation Framework — a structured method for identifying representational misalignment, weakened feedback, proxy substitution, and declining semantic fidelity.Reality Drift Diagnostic for Silent Drift in LLM Workflows — a focused diagnostic for detecting drift hidden behind fluent outputs and apparently normal system performance.Reality Drift Governance Readiness Audit — an organizational audit of the monitoring, verification, escalation, and corrective mechanisms needed to identify and respond to Reality Drift.Together, these tools extend conventional model-drift monitoring beyond changes in data distributions and measurable performance. They examine whether an AI system remains meaningfully connected to its purpose, evidence, users, and operating environment.The collection forms the applied evaluation and governance component of the Semantic Fidelity Project, an independent research initiative examining how meaning is preserved, distorted, and degraded across artificial intelligence systems and repeated layers of representation.The tools are intended for AI engineers, governance and risk teams, organizations deploying language models or agent-based systems, evaluators, auditors, and researchers working on AI reliability and alignment.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.