Skip to content
Open access

Sensory Processing Profiles in Depression: Evidence of Dynamic Changes and Clinical Correlates Over 3 Months

Jan 2026 · Depression and Anxiety · Vol 2026 · 1 citation · 34 references
Medicine

TL;DR

These findings support the relevance of sensory traits as potential clinical markers and therapeutic targets and suggest personalized interventions addressing sensory processing may contribute to improved treatment outcomes.

Abstract

Background Sensory processing difficulties are increasingly recognized in major depressive disorder (MDD), with patients often exhibiting heightened sensitivity, avoidance, and low registration. However, the temporal stability of these patterns—trait vs. state—remains unclear. Methods In this longitudinal study, 45 adult inpatients with MDD were assessed using the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP) at admission and 3 months later; 34 completed both assessments. Clinical variables included depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS‐17]), anxiety (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HARS]), anhedonia (Snaith‐Hamilton Pleasure Scale [SHAPS]), self‐esteem (Rosenberg Self‐Esteem Inventory [RSEI]), and psychomotor retardation (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation [CORE]). Nonparametric tests examined sensory changes and associations with clinical outcomes. Results At follow‐up, 61.8% of participants showed clinical improvement and 44.1% achieved remission. Significant decreases in low registration and sensory sensitivity, along with increased sensation seeking, indicated that sensory processing is dynamic and partially state‐dependent. Sensory avoidance remained stable and was more pronounced in recurrent MDD. Patients with clinical improvement or remission had sensory profiles closer to normative ranges. Higher sensitivity and avoidance correlated with more severe depression, anxiety, and lower self‐esteem, while greater sensation seeking was associated with better outcomes. Conclusions Sensory processing profiles in MDD are state‐dependent and linked to clinical changes. These findings support the relevance of sensory traits as potential clinical markers and therapeutic targets. Personalized interventions addressing sensory processing may contribute to improved treatment outcomes. Further longitudinal and multimodal research is needed to clarify their predictive value. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05686668

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Baseline cortical structural features are associated with depressive and cognitive improvement in major depressive disorder

Baseline cortical morphometric features were associated with clinical and cognitive changes following antidepressant treatment in MDD, and single-ROI LOOCV models based on left cuneus and left SFC FD showed cross-validated associations with symptom improvement.

Yingna Li, Shuping Tian, Siyan Zan et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales as Indicators of SSRI Treatment Response in Youths with Major Depressive Episodes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Findings suggest that ANPS SADNESS and CARE may inform personalized treatment approaches in youths with major depressive episodes; however, the retrospective single-center design limits causal inference and the Korean ANPS remains in early stages of psychometric validation in adolescents, underscoring the need for pros...

Dohyeong Lee, Minseok Lee, K. Davis et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Novelty seeking and rapid symptom improvement across active and sham accelerated iTBS conditions: A pooled individual-patient data analysis.

INTRODUCTION Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and often treatment-resistant. Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), though outcomes vary. Personality traits have been examined in relation to rTMS outcomes, yet the...

C. Chiarenza, B. Cavendish, D. Mao et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

655. Toward a brief, sensitive tool to assess depressive symptom outcomes in research and clinical practice: lessons from the RECOVER trial

Abstract Background In RECOVER, a 12-month, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) comparing active versus sham adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in persons with markedly treatment-resistant depression (mTRD), total scores on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology–Clinician (QIDS-C) and –Self-R...

A. Rush, H. Sackeim, Y.-C. Lee et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

What are the clinical implications of mixed features in major depressive disorder? A VAST-D report.

Mixed features were highly prevalent and associated with greater clinical burden, and Assessment of mixed features may provide clinically relevant information when selecting next-step pharmacologic strategies, particularly when considering a switch to bupropion sustained release.

Sidney Zisook, Lori L Davis, Trisha Suppes et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.