This work formalizes probabilistic alignment as a distributional criterion for world models and introduces PAWBench, a benchmark for evaluating video generators as stochastic samplers of world dynamics, and introduces PAWEval, an outcome-level protocol that converts repeated video rollouts into empirical distributions over possible physical behaviors.
Abstract
Recent video generation models are increasingly framed as world models. Many physical processes can unfold in more than one valid way. Therefore, a world model should reproduce not only a plausible trajectory, but also the distribution of possible behaviors under the same initial observation and action. We call this distribution-level requirement probabilistic alignment. However, existing evaluations largely assess individual-video plausibility and do not test whether repeated generations recover the correct distribution. This raises a central question: how far are current video generators from probabilistically aligned world modeling? To answer it, we formalize probabilistic alignment as a distributional criterion for world models and introduce PAWBench, a benchmark for evaluating video generators as stochastic samplers of world dynamics. We further introduce PAWEval, an outcome-level protocol that converts repeated video rollouts into empirical distributions over possible physical behaviors. Across 50 scenarios and eleven current systems, no model consistently matches the reference probabilities while recovering the range of valid behaviors. Having established this gap, we test whether language prompts, initial noise sampling, or model training can reshape the model's predictive distribution. We believe our work can serve as a foundation for future efforts to move towards probabilistically aligned world modeling.
Large-scale video generation models are increasingly viewed as a promising path toward world models, yet their ability to capture causally coherent physical dynamics remains poorly understood. Existing evaluations largely emphasize visual quality, prompt adherence, or broad physical plausibility, leaving open whether a...
Jia-Liang Li, Zheng-Ning Xu, Zongyang Ma et al.· 0 citations
Understanding and tracking a dynamic world are fundamental to visual intelligence. Existing video benchmarks provide limited insight into whether models can maintain a coherent understanding of evolving world state. Building such a benchmark from real-world videos is challenging because the underlying world state is pa...
Kuan Zhang, Yu-Kun Chen, Zhi-Hao Yang et al.· 0 citations
Symbolic state supervision raises the 20M model's frame accuracy from 31.1% to 67.3% at the same training-data budget, suggesting that learning representations of state changes can complement scaling.
Wei-Hang Guo, Xiao-Yu Wu, Yi-Fei Wang et al.· 0 citations
This work studies action-conditioned predictors built on five frozen self-supervised visual backbones, finding that a world model guides action selection reliably only when the goal lies within, or slightly beyond, the trajectory it imagines during planning.
A. Alrasheed, Basim Azam, Naveed Akhtar· 0 citations
World-model planners typically scale outward by rolling farther, sampling more trajectories, or optimizing longer, while assigning the same computation to every imagined transition. We show that making every transition uniformly deeper wastes computation and can degrade planning because useful refinement is concentrate...
Zi-Jian Jin, Yun-Bei Zhang, Yuan-Zhe Liu et al.· 0 citations
HappyWorld-Bench is introduced, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates whether generated worlds remain reliable as agents interact with them, and highlights the need to evaluate world models not only by visual quality, but also by state consistency and the correctness of their responses to actions and interventions.
Zhi-Qi Bai, Ju-Nai Cai, Yi-Xin Chen et al.· 0 citations
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.