Skip to content

Exact Minimax One-Bit Unbiased Compression: Heavy-Tail Necessity and Finite-Randomness Approximation

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 14 references
Computer Science

Abstract

A pointwise-unbiased one-bit compressor reconstructs every real input in expectation while transmitting one bit. For a scalar source $P$ with CDF $F$, mean $m$, and $\mathcal J(P)=\int_{\mathbb R}\sqrt{F(r)(1-F(r))}\,dr$, we prove that the infimum of the source-averaged reconstruction second moment over all public-coin one-bit codes unbiased on $\mathbb R$ is $m^2+\mathcal J(P)^2$. For regular full-support sources, a distribution-centered random-threshold code attains this value; a converse over arbitrary randomized binary encoders and an equality analysis characterize every attaining code up to null sets, bit relabeling, and public-seed refinement. For the Gaussian location family $\mathcal N(\mu,\sigma^2)$ with $|\mu|\le c\sigma$, the equal prior on the endpoint means is least favorable and the minimax value is $\sigma^2\Lambda_c^2$. Exact Gaussian minimax optimality forces a critical heavy tail: at the endpoint means, absolute moments are finite exactly for $p<3$, and $\Pr(W>t)=\Theta(t^{-3}/\sqrt{\log t})$. A Cauchy-mixture robustification inflates the second moment by at most $1/(1-\eta)$ while making every positive-order absolute moment finite. Finite-support public randomness with finite decoder means cannot achieve exact unbiasedness on $\mathbb R$, but a bounded-output approximation using exactly $R$ shared random bits has explicit bias and second-moment bounds converging to the minimax constant. Finally, coordinate allocation communicates exactly $B$ bits per Gaussian-gradient query. On Kim's continuous quadratic hard family, the expected optimization guarantee matches the lower bound in its dependence on $(\sigma,d,B,\varepsilon)$, and a finite-variance high-probability bound incurs only a logarithmic confidence factor.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.