FairTest is proposed, a search-based testing approach that seeks the unfair executions of a MARL policy and combines search guidance with test prioritization, which detects the most fairness failures compared to three baselines with statistical significance and large effect sizes.
Abstract
Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) trains a team of agents that share one environment and learn their policies together. Training maximizes the team return, and a high return does not imply that the rewards are shared fairly among the agents in every episode. Testing is an established way to discover the failures of deep reinforcement learning, yet few methods address the fairness of MARL. In this work, we propose FairTest, a search-based testing approach that seeks the unfair executions of a MARL policy. The design combines search guidance with test prioritization. The guidance scores each candidate with three fitness functions. One measures the fairness of the runs already performed, another predicts the fairness from abstract states and fairness features, and the third reads the decision uncertainty from the policy. Crossover and mutation derive further candidates from the observed executions. The prioritization ranks the candidates by the predicted fairness and the decision uncertainty, so that the runs reach the candidates where failures are expected. FairTest is evaluated on three environments and two MARL algorithms, and four baselines are given the same budget. It detects the most fairness failures compared to three baselines with statistical significance and large effect sizes. The failure count exceeds that of the strongest baseline by 221% on average and coverage improves by an average of 23%.
MA-USFA, a hierarchical method with two layers: a lower layer of universal successor feature approximators that predicts each agent's successor features while conditioned on its teammates' objectives, and an upper composer that selects, across agents, which library entry each agent should follow and supplies the cross-...
The integration of reinforcement learning (RL) into the optimization of multi-agent collaboration for Large Language Models (LLMs) is an important combination of two advanced areas, Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) and LLMs. This paper thoroughly examines the main approaches, evaluation standards, recent progress and existing...
Qian-Ling Zhang· Applied and Computational En...· 0 citations
Reinforcement learning (RL) for code agents often uses executable tests to provide binary rewards. With these rewards, Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) assigns identical advantages to test-passing trajectories within each rollout group, overlooking differences in implementation quality and adherence to task re...
Jin-Hao Dong, Liang Zhao, Zi-Hao Yue et al.· 1 citation
This paper presents a multi-benchmark evaluation of the Deep Reinforcement Learning Market-Driven Hierarchical Neuro-Fuzzy Politree (DRL-MD-HNFP) [13,14] against six modern multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) baselines [1,4,10,19,20,22], combined with a high-resolution controlled experiment providing intervention...
Leonardo A. F. Mendoza, H. Mello, M. Kohler et al.· Revista de Estudos Interdisc...· 0 citations
Fair Multi-Level Preference Optimization (Fair-MPO or $\Phi$-MPO), a new preference optimization framework for agentic learning, is proposed and a Fair Multi-Level Objective that addresses imbalance in agentic learning is introduced.
Thanh-Dat Truong, Sankalp Pandey, Hugh Churchill et al.· 0 citations
G2MAF applies one globally normalized, projected critic gradient to guide and coordinate all agents'corrections while keeping the action both feasible and close to the frozen policy proposal.
Guo-Wei Zou, Hai-Tao Wang, Guo-Xin Wang et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.