VizAnchor is proposed, a framework for visualization manipulation understanding through dual-anchor evidence construction and VLM-based reasoning that accurately localizes manipulations and produces faithful explanations of their manipulation, misleaders, and misleading intents.
Abstract
Data visualizations are widely used for communicating information, but they are also vulnerable to intentional manipulations that induce misleading interpretations. Existing methods focus on locating tampered regions or recovering hidden information, without explaining how the visualization has been manipulated or why the resulting changes may mislead viewers. We propose \textbf{VizAnchor}, a framework for visualization manipulation understanding through dual-anchor evidence construction and VLM-based reasoning. In the first stage, VizAnchor constructs a semantic anchor to recover authentic chart information and a spatial anchor to localize tampered regions. In the second stage, three specialized agents decode the manipulation. The misleader grounding agent analyzes a four-panel visual prompt to predict the misleader information. The chart narrative reconstruction agent takes the original and tampered charts as inputs and reconstructs their respective visual narratives. Finally, the intent inferring agent integrates the visual evidence and misleader information to infer the misleading intent. We further construct a dataset for tampering localization and a dataset for misleading intent inferring. Evaluation shows that VizAnchor accurately localizes manipulations and produces faithful explanations of their manipulation, misleaders, and misleading intents.
This paper introduces InSight, a benchmark for agentic claim verification over interactive visualizations and evaluates state-of-the-art models, revealing that interactive verification remains a non-trivial challenge.
Maeve Hutchinson, Syed Mahbubul Huq, Mohammad Albinhassan et al.· 0 citations
InsightToast is introduced, a mixed-initiative application that monitors verbal discourse in real time, identifies topics and informational needs as they emerge, and proactively retrieves relevant information through a multi-agent large language model (LLM)-based pipeline integrating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG...
Mohammad Abolnejadian, Matthew Brehmer· 0 citations
Can structured text replace vision for diagram reasoning? A wrong answer after textualization can arise because the representation omits information the question needs, or because the solver fails to use information that is present. We introduce a diagnostic protocol to distinguish these explanations. Using the same so...
Yun-Bei Zhang, Janet Wang, J. Hamm et al.· 0 citations
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, yet the visual and textual evidence supporting the generated responses remains difficult to identify. Faithful token attribution explains an LVLM's response by assigning scores that rank image and prompt tokens by how much the model relies on t...
Bo-Wen Yuan, Danny Wang, Rui-Hong Qiu et al.· 1 citation
Web agents increasingly browse, interpret, and act on web content on behalf of users. In many realistic workflows, however, the visual evidence they consume is not neutral: charts and dashboards can be misleading, shaping judgments without issuing any explicit malicious instruction. Unlike chart question answering, Web...
Yi-Sheng Li, Dong-Ming Han, Hong-Kun Pan et al.· 0 citations
Scientific figures are designed to communicate information visually, yet MLLMs typically explain them by translating their visual content back into text. This requires readers to manually map the resulting explanations back to the figure. Inspired by how people present visual information, we introduce FigAct, a framewo...
Shi-Shi Xiao, Zi-Chao Wang, Alexa F. Siu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.