Skip to content

Improving Water Demand Forecasting Models Understanding with XAI Methods

Dec 2026 · Journal of water resources planning and management · 0 citations · 38 references
Water resources management and optimization

Abstract

Understanding the main drivers of water demand predictive models is important for model applications and usability. The ever-increasing computational capacity has enabled multiple complex models to excel at predicting demand values. However, the understanding of how the model works and what predictors are responsible for the model’s outputs can be improved with the use of eXplainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods. We present a comprehensive and systematic XAI implementation to enhance the understanding of common predictive models, such as tree-based ensembles and artificial neural networks and compare them with a simple yet highly explainable multiple linear regression model. By using a monthly residential demand dataset, we focused on discovering the positive and negative effects of multiple features, including socioeconomic and weather determinants. XAI methods include the SHapley additive exPlanations values, the local interpretable model-agnostic explanations values, and partial dependence plots. Results show that property size variables, like lot and building areas, contribute to above-average predictions of water demand. Additionally, weather-related predictors, such as mean temperature and humidity, significantly enhance the models’ predictability. XAI methods also show that an approximate constant monthly demand can be expected from houses when temperature values do not significantly vary. Finally, an uncertainty analysis highlights tree-based models as the most robust when working with noisy predictors. XAI methods may assist water management strategies by providing important details on behind-the-scenes complex predictive models that enhance the models’ usability in the water sector.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2025

Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...

Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee · 112 citations · ⚡10

The Death of Schema Linking? Text-to-SQL in the Age of Well-Reasoned Language Models

This work revisits schema linking when using the latest generation of large language models (LLMs) and finds empirically that newer models are adept at utilizing relevant schema elements during generation even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant ones.

Karime Maamari, Fadhil Abubaker, Daniel Jaroslawicz et al. · 109 citations · ⚡19

BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models

A novel threat is unveiled in which attackers steer the RAG system's response by injecting malicious passages into its knowledge base, enabling the attacker to steer the response without altering the user input or modifying the RAG weights.

Jiaqi Xue, Meng Zheng, Yebowen Hu et al. · 109 citations · ⚡8

PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection

Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.

Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al. · 73 citations · ⚡4

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.