Aug 2026· Revista de Estudos Interdisciplinares· Vol 25, pp. e3773· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is concluded that systematic frailty screening, combined with coordinated multiprofessional management, should be incorporated as routine practice in the surgical planning of older cancer patients.
Abstract
Frailty has become a relevant risk factor among older adults undergoing elective oncological surgery, as it reduces physiological reserve and increases vulnerability to postoperative complications. However, knowledge on screening instruments and multiprofessional preoperative management strategies remains scattered across the literature. This study aimed to analyze, through an integrative review, the scientific evidence indicating frailty as a predictor of complications in this population, as well as to identify the screening tools and multiprofessional care strategies employed. Searches were carried out in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane Library, SciELO, and the Virtual Health Library, using DeCS/MeSH descriptors combined through Boolean operators, considering studies published between 2016 and 2026. Results consistently confirmed frailty as a predictor of complications in surgeries. Instruments such as the Clinical Frailty Scale and the G8 proved effective for initial screening, directing vulnerable patients toward comprehensive geriatric assessment. Preoperative management delivered by coordinated, rather than merely juxtaposed, multiprofessional teams was associated with fewer complications and shorter hospital stay. It is concluded that systematic frailty screening, combined with coordinated multiprofessional management, should be incorporated as routine practice in the surgical planning of older cancer patients.
BACKGROUND
Older adults with lung cancer are increasingly being considered for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), including segmentectomy or lobectomy with lymph node assessment. Although VATS reduces surgical trauma compared with thoracotomy, it does not eliminate heterogeneity in physiological reserve, treatment tolerance, or postoperative recovery. Frailty may therefore complement conventional preoperative assessment, which is typically based on chronological age, comorbidity burden, pulmonary function, and cardiac risk.
METHODS AND MAIN FINDINGS
This narrative review summarises the evidence on frailty assessment, perioperative outcomes, and prehabilitation strategies in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery, with a particular emphasis on VATS. Practical tools, such as the Clinical Frailty Scale and 4-metre gait speed, may support routine screening because they are brief, feasible, and clinically interpretable. More comprehensive approaches, including multidimensional frailty indices, nutritional assessment, sarcopenia evaluation, and comprehensive geriatric assessment, may be useful for selected patients. Available evidence suggests that frailty is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications, prolonged hospitalisation, non-home discharge, increased healthcare utilisation, and mortality after lung resection. However, direct evidence from frail patients with lung cancer undergoing VATS remains limited, and many recommendations are extrapolated from mixed thoracic surgery cohorts, studies of open lung resection, geriatric oncology, and non-thoracic surgical literature.
CONCLUSIONS
Frailty should be considered an actionable component of perioperative risk stratification, rather than a stand-alone criterion for determining surgical eligibility or the extent of VATS resection. Future studies in thoracic oncology should define optimal frailty assessment pathways and determine whether frailty-guided interventions can improve short-term recovery, long-term functional outcomes, tolerance of adjuvant therapy, and oncological outcomes after minimally invasive lung cancer surgery.
Yiming Xu, Mingming Cao, Yuting Liu et al.· World Journal of Surgical On...· 0 citations
Background/Objectives: Frailty is increasingly recognized as a clinically relevant marker of reduced physiological reserve in surgical oncology. The modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) is simple and practical, but its clinical significance in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains incompletely defined. This study evaluated the association between mFI-5-defined frailty and postoperative complications, especially postoperative delirium, as well as survival outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for OSCC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 127 patients who underwent surgical resection for OSCC with postoperative high care unit (HCU) management between 2013 and 2021. Frailty was defined as an mFI-5 score of ≥2. Clinical characteristics, postoperative outcomes, HCU stay, length of hospital stay, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between frail and non-frail groups. Univariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for postoperative complications. An exploratory multivariable logistic regression analysis for postoperative delirium was performed using age ≥65 years and sex as covariates. Delirium was retrospectively assessed from clinical documentation considered consistent with DSM-5 criteria. Results: Twenty-one patients (16.5%) were classified as frail. Postoperative delirium occurred more frequently in frail patients than in non-frail patients (42.9% vs. 19.8%; p = 0.023). In a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for age ≥65 years and sex, mFI-5-defined frailty was significantly associated with postoperative delirium (adjusted OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.08–8.60; p = 0.035). No significant association was observed for pneumonia, surgical site infection, or free-flap reoperation. Frailty was not significantly associated with HCU stay, length of hospital stay, OS, or DFS. Conclusions: mFI-5-defined frailty was associated with postoperative delirium but not with survival outcomes in this OSCC cohort. Because this retrospective study was limited by sample size, comorbidity-driven mFI-5 scoring, non-standardized delirium screening, and potential residual confounding, mFI-5 should be interpreted as a convenient screening marker rather than a stand-alone predictor. Comprehensive perioperative assessment incorporating frailty, nutrition, sarcopenia, cognition, tumor burden, and treatment-related factors may better identify patients at risk.
K. Yamagata, S. Fukuzawa, Shohei Takaoka et al.· Diagnostics· 0 citations
While the study successfully establishes a statistical association, it is believed a deeper discussion is warranted regarding the distinction between population-level risk markers and individual-level predictive tools, the robustness of the causal inference, and the holistic interpretation of surgical benefit.
Frailty is a multidimensional syndrome characterized by reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors, significantly elevating the risk of postoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality. As the population ages, prevalence of frailty among surgical patients is rising. This article summarizes current knowledge on frailty as a key predictor of surgical risk, introduces validated tools for its assessment, and discusses their application in clinical practice. Furthermore, it highlights prehabilitation as an effective intervention to improve the patients' baseline condition and reduce postoperative complications. Based on available evidence, frailty is a modifiable condition whose early identification and targeted interventions have the potential to significantly influence surgical outcomes and overall patient prognosis. The article calls for routine integration of frailty assessment into perioperative clinical care.
Markéta Polková, Pavel Kabele, Jana Matějíčková et al.· Ceska gynekologie· 0 citations