Nonlinear kernels improve the accuracy of genomic prediction while preserving the inferential framework of quantitative genetics. Improving the predictive accuracy of genomic prediction (GP) for complex genetic architectures involving non-additive effects and genotype-by-environment interactions (GEI) requires alternative approaches beyond conventional linear models such as Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP). In this study, we evaluated grain yield, protein content, and oil content in the SoyNAM population, comprising 1,379 genotypes evaluated across six environments, to compare four non-linear kernels (Laplacian, Gaussian, Bessel, and Polynomial) with the GBLUP and Random Forest a Machine Learning model. Two variance structures (main effects and main plus interaction effects) were evaluated under three cross-validation schemes: CV1 (predicting untested genotypes in observed environments), CV2 (predicting tested genotypes in observed environments), and CV0 (predicting tested genotypes in unobserved environments). In addition, we tested the same models in a epistatic trait simulated dataset. The inclusion of GEI effects substantially improved predictive accuracy for grain yield under CV1 and CV2, whereas only modest gains were observed for protein and oil content. Across traits and validation schemes, the nonlinear kernels consistently matched or outperformed GBLUP, with the greatest advantage observed for oil content and under the CV0 scheme. No single nonlinear kernel consistently outperformed the others, indicating that kernel performance was environment dependent. Compared with Random Forest, the non-linear kernels achieved comparable or superior predictive accuracy while preserving the mixed-model framework, enabling the estimation of variance components. Moreover, in the extra dataset, the Laplacian kernel consistently showed high predictive accuracy across all scenarios, supporting its use as a promising option to the widely used Gaussian kernel. Therefore, non-linear kernel methods provide a robust and interpretable alternative for GP.
In this study, a dataset derived from a natural rice population was used to develop two genomic prediction models, genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and a convolutional neural network (CNN), together with a gene-based crop modeling framework, which provided valuable insights into modeling genotype-by-envi...
Jinhan Zhang, Wei-Jie Tang, Hong-Wei Ma et al.· Theoretical and Applied Gene...· 0 citations
Abstract Genetic gains of oat (Avena sativa L.) grain yield have been historically low compared to other major cereal crops. The use of machine learning models to capture complex interactions and leveraging data types other than genomic information in prediction models has great potential for improving complex traits i...
Samuel A. Adewale, M. A. Babar, D. Jarquín et al.· The Plant Genome· 0 citations
Predictive breeding has been proposed as an effective approach to accelerate genetic gain for complex traits. Genomic prediction (GP) models have been developed in alfalfa (
Medicago sativa
L.) for key traits in the last decade. More recently, phenomic prediction (PP) models have been proposed as a low‐cost, high...
P. Sipowicz, Ayush K. Sharma, M. M. Andrade et al.· The Plant Phenome Journal· 0 citations
Overall, the proposed statistical decomposition and component-wise modeling improved the use of environmental and genomic information, although the magnitude and source of predictive gains were strongly trait-dependent.
Genotype-by-environment interaction is a major challenge for breeding programs, limiting the predictive ability of genomic selection in untested environments. We propose a Stacked Generalization framework that integrates linear mixed models (factor analytic and genomic best linear unbiased prediction), enviromic reacti...
Marcos Antonio de Godoy, Maurício dos Santos Araújo, J. T. B. Chagas et al.· G3· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.