Skip to content

From disclosure to verification: a risk-differentiated framework for the ethical use of AI in academic research

Sep 2026 · Ethics and Information Technology · Vol 28 · 0 citations · 33 references

TL;DR

A risk-differentiated verification framework is developed that calibrates verification practice to the epistemic stakes of different AI uses, and argues that the property at stake is warrant: whether content has passed through a process that entitles a reader to rely on it.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Breaking the shackles of confidentiality: Why AI should “free” scientific knowledge

This topic piece argues that while confidentiality is a foundational element of academic trust, treating all unpublished manuscripts as absolute secrets can inadvertently delay the dissemination of socially valuable knowledge.

Hasan Durmuş · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

When No One Owns the Judgment: Accountability Under Contribution Dissolution in Human-AI Collaboration

This work exposes the limits of disclosure rules and provenance records as responses to AI-mediated collaboration and offers three directions for discussion: distinguishing the roles AI plays, identifying judgments that require clear human ownership, and creating conditions in which AI involvement can be disclosed with...

Heng-Zhi Ye · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

AI-Mediated Ethical Communication: Epistemic Totalization the Fabricatable Zone and the Governmental Chain of Custody as Terminus

Large language models and AI-mediated search systems have become the primary intermediaries for institutional information across educational, legal, civic, and professional life. Current models of AI ethics focus primarily on the accuracy, bias, and fairness of AI systems. This focus is essential but fails to recognize...

Jonathan D. Nelson · 0 citations
Aug 2026

When AI use becomes the norm: Researcher perspectives on AI disclosure policy and practice.

The study provides empirical evidence supporting the development of a structured AI contribution taxonomy as a more principled and practical alternative to existing disclosure practices and suggests that effective AI disclosure governance should incorporate field-sensitive adaptation rather than relying on uniform impl...

Ayoung Yoon, Siena Oristaglio · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Academic Integrity in the Age of AI: A Document Analysis of Plagiarism, Authorship, and Ethical Governance in Education

This study explores how educational institutions in the Philippines address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence (AI) in maintaining academic integrity. Using qualitative document analysis, purposively selected institutional policies, guidelines, and ethical frameworks were examined to identify prevailing ap...

Precila Jabagat, Benedict V. Omblero, Esthrer-Rose Gabonada et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

GPT-Lab Oct 14, 2026

Building trustworthy AI: The role of AI harnesses, intent contracts and evals

AI is moving beyond impressive demos. After World Summit AI 2026 in Amsterdam, GPT-Lab's Muhammad Waseem reflects on what organizations need to make AI agents reliable, responsible and genuinely useful in everyday work. The post Building trustworthy AI: The role of AI harnesses, intent contracts and evals appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.