Skip to content

Retrospective registration of a systematic review protocol: AI-Based Intrusion Detection and Prevention: A Systematic Review and Adversarial-Validity Audit of Benchmark Datasets

Sep 2026 · Open Science Framework

Abstract

Retrospective registration of a systematic review protocol. This review was conducted and submitted prior to registration; no prospective registration was performed. The review synthesizes AI-based techniques for intrusion detection and prevention, drawing on 71 peer-reviewed studies published between 2019 and 2025, selected following the PRISMA 2020 protocol. It organizes the reviewed methods into seven categories — traditional machine learning, deep learning, hybrid intelligence frameworks, blockchain-based systems, reinforcement learning, ensemble learning, and explainable AI — and compares their reported performance across more than twelve attack types using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, false-positive rate, and latency where available. It also contributes a provenance-and-validity audit of the benchmark datasets used across the corpus. The protocol below was reconstructed from the methods actually used in the review and is registered retrospectively for transparency and reproducibility.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.