Skip to content
Review

Drug resistance in breast cancer brain metastasis: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.

Aug 2026 · Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · Vol 1881, pp. 189684 · 0 citations · 238 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This comprehensive review highlights BMBC resistance mechanisms, drawing from preclinical models, clinical studies, and genomic analyses, and highlights the potential for personalized, multi-targeted approaches to improve patient outcomes in BMBC.

Abstract

Brain-metastatic breast cancer (BMBC) is a severe complication of advanced breast cancer, affecting 15-30% of metastatic patients, particularly those with HER2-positive or triple-negative subtypes, and is associated with dismal prognosis and median survival under 12 months. Therapeutic resistance, driven by the central nervous system's sanctuary role, poses a major barrier to effective treatment, often resulting in discordant intracranial versus extracranial responses. This comprehensive review highlights BMBC resistance mechanisms, drawing from preclinical models, clinical studies, and genomic analyses. Key drivers include genetic/epigenetic alterations, BBB-mediated drug exclusion via efflux transporters, and microenvironmental interactions with astrocytes and immune cells that promote survival signaling. Additional factors encompass cancer stem cell plasticity/dormancy enabling therapy evasion, metabolic reprogramming and extracellular matrix remodeling that shields tumor from drugs. We highlight how these interconnected pathways create a protective niche for metastatic cells. Promising strategies to overcome resistance include BBB-penetrant agents, antibody-drug conjugates, nanomedicine, and combination therapies targeting the tumor microenvironment and epigenetics. By integrating mechanistic insights with translational opportunities, this review emphasizes the potential for personalized, multi-targeted approaches to improve patient outcomes in BMBC.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access 2026

Breast cancer stem cells: drivers of progression and therapeutic resistance

Plastic features of BCSCs are summarized, their roles in metastasis and multidrug resistance, microenvironmental regulation and relevant therapeutic targeting strategies are summarized and progress toward subtype-specific combination approaches is indicated.

Mu-Yao Li, Ying Zhou, Xin-Qi Liu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Current and future therapies for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer remains an aggressive and biologically heterogeneous breast cancer subtype. Although the therapeutic landscape has expanded, durable disease control remains clinically challenging in many settings. Existing reviews often organize TNBC therapy by drug class or molecular subtype, which can obscure how treatment response is shaped by interacting biological layers. Here, we review current and emerging therapeutic strategies through a three-layer framework: tumor-cell-intrinsic vulnerabilities, the local immune and stromal microenvironment, and host-level systemic modifiers. We summarize established approaches, including chemotherapy, immune checkpoint blockade, antibody–drug conjugates and PARP inhibition in biomarker-defined settings, and distinguish them from maturing or exploratory strategies such as pathway-directed therapy, epigenetic modulation, anti-vascular combinations, regulated cell-death induction, cellular therapy, vaccines, microbiome-related interventions, liquid biopsy, AI-supported multiomics and adaptive trial designs. This framework integrates evidence level, disease stage, biomarker reliability and patient tolerance into treatment selection for TNBC precision therapy.

Zi-Xun Wang, Xi-Yu Liu, Yu-Xiao Wu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Pathway dysregulation and therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma: molecular mechanisms and emerging therapeutic targets

Abstract Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in adults and remains associated with poor survival despite advances in surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Increasing evidence suggests that IDH-wildtype glioblastoma progression is driven by complex interactions between dysregulated molecular signaling pathways, intratumoral heterogeneity, glioma stem cells, and immune suppression within the tumor microenvironment. Objective: This narrative review summarizes the major signaling pathways implicated in GBM pathogenesis, including EGFR, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Wnt, and TGF-β signaling, while also discussing emerging therapeutic targets such as FGFR3–TACC3 fusions, regorafenib, and natural killer cell-based immunotherapy. Results The review further examines mechanisms underlying treatment resistance and the limitations of current targeted therapies. Although many pathway-directed treatments have demonstrated promising preclinical activity, clinical translation remains challenging because of compensatory signaling, blood–brain barrier limitations, and molecular heterogeneity. Conclusion: Future progress will likely depend on biomarker-driven patient stratification, improved CNS drug delivery, and rational combination therapies capable of simultaneously targeting multiple tumor-promoting mechanisms.

William W Li, J. Chen, Yiying Ma · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Therapeutic Implications in Improving the Tumor Microenvironment in Breast Cancer Treatment: An Update

Among the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, breast cancer presents fundamental challenges, such as tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance. The tumor microenvironment (TME), comprising stromal components, signaling molecules, immune cells, and the extracellular matrix, has demonstrated a pivotal role in tumor progression, invasion, and therapeutic response. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the state-of-the-art and novel therapeutic strategies developed to reprogram the TME in breast cancer. From clinically established treatments, such as endocrine therapy, antibody-drug conjugates, and HER2-targeted therapy, to emerging agents, such as siRNA-mediated gene silencing, nanomedicine, and immunotherapy, each class of therapeutic strategy, along with the corresponding clinical and preclinical outcomes, is detailed by category. The evidence for and impact of TME heterogeneity and differences in molecular subtypes on therapeutic efficiency are highlighted, and biomarker-guided patient stratification is further emphasized to support precision therapy. Mechanistic challenges, such as immunosuppression, ECM remodeling, and hypoxia-associated resistance, were analyzed, and mechanistic conflicts or synergistic interactions between strategies were identified. Tumor microbiome modification and AIdriven discovery of novel biomarkers are presented as emerging perspectives in TME-targeting therapy. Despite significant advances, translation barriers, such as the lack of predictive biomarkers and the divergence in therapeutic outcomes between patients and animal models, are critically reviewed and discussed. The integration of TME-targeted and individualized therapeutic strategies may offer promising prospects toward achieving durable clinical outcomes in breast cancer treatment.

P. Shankar, Gowthamarajan Kuppusamy, Apsara Unni et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Systemic therapy-induced resistance and toxicity in breast cancer: Sensitization and mitigation strategies.

Breast cancer is the most frequently reported cancer in women, with high mortality and morbidity globally. Paclitaxel, doxorubicin, tamoxifen, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil are cornerstones of standard-of-care treatment for primary and advanced breast cancers, targeting distinct molecular mechanisms. However, the evolution of acquired resistance primarily leads to treatment failure and progression to metastasis, ultimately to patient mortality. Furthermore, their effectiveness is limited by potential toxicities in various organs. These limitations present an extreme challenge for the management of breast cancer at the advanced stage. This review uncovers recent updates on acquired resistance mechanisms toward standard-of-care treatments driven by deeply rooted heterogeneity and aggressive nature through direct counteracting of its core action, hyperactivation of survival pathways, silencing of core cell death pathways, derepressing the expression of multidrug resistance proteins, metabolic reprogramming, epigenetic modifications, and exosome-mediated horizontal transfer of resistance phenotype. In addition, we discuss recent updates on potential strategies to overcome resistance and toxicities induced by standard-of-care treatments. Ultimately, this review helps to identify novel strategies targeting pathways to reverse resistance and reduce toxicity in breast cancer patients.

Anuveda Sree Samudrala, G. P. Nagaraju, RamaRao Malla · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Drug Resistance in Multiple Myeloma: Tumor‐Intrinsic Mechanisms and the Bone Marrow Microenvironment

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disorder, and despite substantial improvements in prognosis achieved through chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and autologous stem cell transplantation, most patients ultimately develop relapsed or refractory disease. Drug resistance (DR) is increasingly recognized as a dynamically evolving ecosystem shaped by tumor‐intrinsic plasticity and continuous remodeling of the bone marrow microenvironment (BMME), rather than as a single molecular lesion. This review summarizes the major mechanisms of resistance across key drug classes, including alterations in drug targets and signaling nodes, rewiring of apoptotic, proteostatic, and metabolic circuits, and BMME‐dependent protection. We highlight how these processes converge on a limited set of survival hubs and collectively raise the apoptotic threshold under therapeutic pressure. The key to overcoming DR is to conceptualize it as an evolving ecosystem, thereby enabling rational, mechanism‐based combination and sequencing strategies that may prolong progression‐free survival and move MM closer to a functional cure.

Yixuan Chen, Wen-Ming Huang, Mingxuan Tang et al. · 0 citations