Skip to content

WeatherDiagFlow: Evidence-Grounded Radar Nowcasting with Diagnostic Flow Refinement

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 21 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

WeatherDiagFlow connects numerical prediction, evidence-grounded reporting, and auditable verification under a leakage-controlled protocol to formulate radar nowcasting as an evidence-grounded forecast--bulletin--audit task, in which a numerical forecaster produces both future radar fields and structured diagnostic evidence.

Abstract

Radar nowcasting is essential for short-term warning and emergency response, yet conventional systems mainly return future radar fields and provide limited support for operational communication and post-event verification. We formulate radar nowcasting as an evidence-grounded forecast--bulletin--audit task, in which a numerical forecaster produces both future radar fields and structured diagnostic evidence. Forecast-time bulletins use only model-available evidence, whereas post-event audits incorporate future radar truth only after the forecast horizon is observed. Based on this task formulation, WeatherDiagFlow predicts motion, growth and decay, heavy-echo risk, and uncertainty to condition rolling flow refinement, while frozen-scaffold residual calibration improves long-lead strong-echo preservation. A multi-agent layer converts the structured evidence into operational bulletins and independently generates verification audits without feeding textual outputs back into the forecaster. Experiments on FJRADAR demonstrate competitive overall performance and improved strong-echo event skill. WeatherDiagFlow therefore connects numerical prediction, evidence-grounded reporting, and auditable verification under a leakage-controlled protocol.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.