It is argued that the highest-confidence candidates emerge where deep learning and first-principles models agree, a "sweet spot" that balances generative flexibility with thermodynamic realism.
Abstract
This Perspective explores recent methods and prospective ideas for developing hybrid AI-physics-based pipelines for protein and antibody de novo design. We argue that the highest-confidence candidates emerge where deep learning and first-principles models agree, a "sweet spot" that balances generative flexibility with thermodynamic realism. For example, although interface confidence scores such as ipTM, pDockQ2, or ipSAE are widely used to rank generated designs, we show that they are not well suited to rank similar sequences, which suggests the need to combine them with physics-based methods to improve design filtering and ranking. Furthermore, we describe a generalizable framework for implementing antibody design pipelines that combine AI with physics-based modeling and scoring methods and also showcase MadraX, a differentiable and AI-compatible implementation of the FoldX force field. In addition, we classify three tiers of AI-physics integration, from post hoc filtering to full embedding of differentiable physics inside deep learning models. Finally, we discuss the future of the protein design community and underline the need to support current initiatives for community wide blind assessments of the growing number of de novo design pipelines.
This mini review traces the evolution of AI-driven methods in protein research, from early residue-contact prediction using coevolutionary information to transformative breakthroughs, the rise of protein language models (PLMs), and the emerging era of generative design and functional modeling.
Guodong Min, Huan Peng· Methods in molecular biology· 0 citations
A systematic NMR-characterized dataset of mutants of the GA/GB model fold-switching system is presented and it is found that this benchmark revealed variable and position-dependent performance across methods, with certain AlphaFold2-based algorithms able to predict mutant effects at individual sites, indicating some understanding of physical effects of residue substitutions.
Nathaniel R. Felbinger, K. Carillo, Yihong Chen et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Deep Learning for Proteins: a series of 10 interactive notebook modules that introduce fundamental machine-learning concepts, guide users through training machine-learning models for protein-related tasks, and ultimately present cutting-edge protein structure prediction and design pipelines are developed.
Michael Chungyoun, G. Au, Britnie Carpentier et al.· The Biophysicist· 0 citations
Deep-Interact Studio is, to the authors' knowledge, the only such platform to combine fine-grained per-layer model customization with multi-model comparison and interpretability, offering a flexible and transparent alternative to fixed, single-purpose tools.
Dipayan Sarkar, K. Bardhan, Chiranjib Sarkar· bioRxiv· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that a truncated version of ProteinDock can be used to choose the optimal prediction among outputs from multiple deep learning-based tools, and shown that this strategy is a computationally efficient alternative to increasing the seed quantity for deep-learning predictions.
G. Rajagopal, Søren C. Spina, Joe Bailey et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
This work proposes the first Bayesian flow formulation for protein backbone orientations by recasting orientation modeling as an equivalent hyperspherical generation problem with antipodal symmetry and delivers consistently exceptional performance in both peptide and antibody design tasks.
Hanlin Wu, Yuxuan Song, Zhe Zhang et al.· Advances in Neural Informati...· 0 citations