2026· Journal of Communication Pedagogy· 0 citations· 3 references
TL;DR
It is argued that surveillance-oriented AI policies reinforce a banking model of education, foreclosing substantive engagement with students about the ethical, relational, and epistemic implications of AI use.
Abstract
We articulate a critical communication pedagogy approach to the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) that addresses a tension in introductory communication courses: institutional pressures for AI policies that are easy to implement and enforce versus relational approaches that are more consonant with long-term professional growth and agency. Drawing on Freire (2000), Fassett and Rudick (2023), and others, we contend that surveillance-oriented AI policies reinforce a banking model of education, foreclosing substantive engagement with students about the ethical, relational, and epistemic implications of AI use. In centering the work of TA supervisors, we articulate problem posing as a framework for AI policy development that foregrounds human connection and positions AI as a catalyst for inquiry. We conclude with a set of agenda-setting questions to guide TA supervisors, department leaders, and communication pedagogy scholars in building communities of practice that foster agency, ethical discernment, and critical understanding of AI’s role in communication education.
The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has prompted universities to develop policies regulating its use in teaching, learning, and assessment. Little empirical research has examined how they conceptualise assessment, and the assumptions underpinning their normative frameworks. This study addresse...
M. Feixas, Georgeta Ion, Liana Pirovino et al.· Journal of Adult Learning, K...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that academic integrity in the GenAI era is shifting from a primarily punitive model toward a pedagogy-first ecosystem that combines clear expectations, assessment redesign, equitable access to vetted tools, and iterative governance.
Yu-Feng Qian· International Journal for Ed...· 0 citations
Higher education institutions are rapidly integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into teaching, operations, and governance, yet students remain predominantly positioned as beneficiaries of these efforts rather than contributors to them. Just as the faculty role has shifted in response to AI, the learner role is chang...
C. Arcolin, Angela Gunder, Melissa Vito et al.· Ubiquity Proceedings· 0 citations
Applying Critical Policy Analysis and Jencks’ framework of educational opportunity, the study shows that policy silence is not the absence of governance but a governance choice, one that shapes how access, responsibility, and fairness are determined.
A. Miles, Khalid H. Arar· Improving Schools· 0 citations
With a promise of efficiency-related benefits, Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are being rapidly integrated into educational practice, be it officially or not. Yet, a growing corpus of research highlights epistemic, pedagogical, and sociotechnical risks, such as bias, hallucination, surveillance, dependency, and t...
Lucas Guarise, Emanuel Felipe Duarte· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
Drawing on Priestley, Biesta, and Robinson’s ecological approach to teacher agency, and on Biesta and Tedder’s account of agency as an ecological achievement, this paper defines teacher agency not as a personal trait but as something achieved through the interaction of past experience, future orientation, present judge...
Wei Wang· Journal of Education, Humani...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.