Skip to content
Review Open access

From AI Alerts to Accountable Decisions: A Governance Framework for Regulatory Compliance

2026 · International journal of research and innovation in social science · Vol 10, pp. 2394-2403 · 0 citations

TL;DR

The STAGE framework is proposed as a practical approach to maintaining human judgment and organizational accountability when integrating AI into regulatory compliance and focuses on whether organizations can use AI to identify risks while keeping qualified people responsible for interpreting alerts, making decisions, documenting actions, and correcting weaknesses.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to manage regulatory and ethical compliance obligations. This paper examines AI’s role in regulatory compliance with particular attention to human oversight, accountability, transparency, employee competency, and organizational governance. It builds on existing scholarship on AI governance, regulatory technology, compliance risk identification, human oversight, and organizational AI readiness. It argues that increased reliance on AI can create an accountability gap when organizations lack effective human oversight and clearly defined responsibility. The paper also incorporates findings from a recent practitioner survey the author conducted. The survey findings reveal that human oversight, AI accuracy, and reliability are the top challenges to AI’s use for compliance. Respondents also identified privacy and data security, employee knowledge and training, unclear processes, and integration with existing systems as significant concerns. Building on existing literature and the survey findings, the paper proposes the STAGE framework (Scan, Triage, Assess, Govern, and Evaluate) as a practical approach to maintaining human judgment and organizational accountability when integrating AI into regulatory compliance. STAGE does not treat AI as an independent decision-maker. Instead, it positions AI as a support tool that requires constant human verification and clear escalation paths. The framework focuses on whether organizations can use AI to identify risks while keeping qualified people responsible for interpreting alerts, making decisions, documenting actions, and correcting weaknesses.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Governing AI in the Workplace: A Case Study of Algorithmic Risk, Ethics, and Regulatory Compliance in Human Resource Management

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming human resource management through applications such as automated recruitment, candidate screening, workforce analytics, employee evaluation, and decision support. While these technologies can improve operational efficiency and support data-driven HR practices, t...

Jaganathan Balaji · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

AI Lifecycle Records and Paradata: Reconceptualizing Documentation Requirements for Transparency and Accountability

Artificial intelligence (AI) governance frameworks are emerging in response to growing demands for transparency, accountability, and regulatory oversight. However, many lack integrated recordkeeping requirements needed to document the AI system lifecycle. This study examines how AI documentation, documentation artifact...

Patricia C. Franks · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence and the Future of HR Governance: A Review of Ethics, Risk Management, and Regulatory Compliance

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming human resource management through applications in recruitment, employee evaluation, workforce analytics, talent management, and organizational decision-making. However, the growing use of AI in employment-related processes has also raised concerns regarding algo...

Jaganathan Balaji · 0 citations
#explainable ai Review Sep 2026

From responsibility gaps to meaningful human control: an ethical and regulatory governance framework for intelligent AI systems

The study demonstrates how MHC can be translated from an ethical principle into governance practice and shows that meaningful control depends not only on human involvement in decisions, but also on defined purposes and boundaries, operational procedures for review and correction, legal safeguards, and institutional cap...

Tak-Ming Yu, Xia Zheng, Hoi-Kuen Ng · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

AI-Driven HR Governance in Global Organizations: Integrating Ethical Intelligence, Risk Management, and Regulatory Compliance

Background: The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in human resource management has transformed recruitment, employee evaluation, workforce analytics, and decision-making. However, the growing use of AI also introduces ethical concerns, algorithmic bias, privacy risks, accountability challenges, and increas...

Jaganathan Balaji · 0 citations
Review Open access 2025

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A REVIEW

The increasing adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across corporate operations has introduced a paradigm shift in corporate governance practices in India. From automated compliance monitoring and financial analysis to predictive risk management and strategic decision-making, AI technologies are reshaping the manne...

Aditya Vikram, Pulkit Marwaha, Monu Chaudhary et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.