Benefit-Risk Balance for Medicinal Products: Report Summary from the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) Working Group XII.
By embedding structured, patient-centered BRA into lifecycle management, the CIOMS Working Group XII report provides a roadmap for transparent, evidence-based decisions that safeguard public health and optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Abstract
Purpose
Benefit-risk assessment (BRA) is a foundation of regulatory decision making and clinical practice for medicinal products. Although historically assessments relied on expert judgment and narrative summaries, over time, expectations have shifted toward approaches that are more structured, transparent, and patient centered. At the same time, therapeutic innovation, new data sources, and evolving stakeholder roles have increased the complexity and uncertainty of benefit-risk decision making.
Methods
The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) Working Group XII developed updated consensus guidance for BRA through multidisciplinary international collaboration among regulators, industry, and academia.
Findings
This narrative review summarizes the CIOMS Working Group XII consensus framework, which advances a structured, transparent, and life-cycle based approach to BRA. The framework puts forward patient‑centric approaches by moving benefit-risk evaluation from a post‑hoc exercise to integrated assessments that enable holistic patient-level BRAs. The structured benefit-risk framework harmonizes qualitative and quantitative methods, integrates patient perspectives, and emphasizes transparency in communication.
IMPLICATIONS
Ultimately, the CIOMS Working Group XII consensus report advances the science and practice of BRAs, ensuring that medicinal products are assessed in a structured and systematic format from early development throughout the lifecycle. By embedding structured, patient-centered BRA into lifecycle management, the CIOMS Working Group XII report provides a roadmap for transparent, evidence-based decisions that safeguard public health and optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Five key recommendations for future health risk assessments are concluded, prioritizing PFAS; improving analytical methods; promoting generation of robust data and data gap filling; promoting open science, including the development of shared data infrastructure and cross-institutional knowledge exchange; and strengthen...
J. Kowalczyk, Klaus Abraham, Christina August et al.· Archives of Toxicology· 0 citations
Surgical innovation and oncologic practice are evolving rapidly. However, the evidence base supporting many interventions/decisions in surgical oncology remains vulnerable to bias, limited generalizability, and inconsistent reporting. To address this gap, this multidisciplinary review, developed through structured disc...
A. Gronchi, G. Bogani, R. Agresti et al.· European Journal of Surgical...· 0 citations
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR/MAs) are widely regarded as the highest level of evidence and play a crucial role in informing clinical practice, public health policy, and guideline development. However, the rapid proliferation of evidence syntheses has raised concerns regarding research redundancy, publicatio...
Sudip Bhattacharya, Abha Kumari, Vanishree Ramanathan et al.· Indian Journal of Community...· 0 citations
This list of 10 priority areas for regulatory science research related to the use of artificial intelligence in the medicine lifecycle aims to support researchers and research funding bodies in addressing knowledge gaps on artificial intelligence in the medicines lifecycle.
Luis C. Pinheiro, Amanda C Langston, M. Orre et al.· Clinical pharmacology and th...· 0 citations
OBJECTIVES
Hierarchical composite endpoints (HCEs) combine different clinical attributes in a single endpoint and establish a ranking of these components based on clinical importance. We studied the acceptance of HCEs in infectious disease clinical trials for clinical and regulatory decision-making.
METHODS
We conduc...
A. de Jong, Daphne S. A. Bennink, Selina Ehrenzeller et al.· Clinical Microbiology and In...· 0 citations
Regulators, such as the FDA and EMA, are increasingly signaling expectations for broader and earlier adoption of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to reduce, refine, and, where justified, replace animal studies (3Rs principle)—particularly where NAMs can deliver improved human relevance, clearer mechanistic insight, or...
Sabine M. Poppenborg, D. Webster, B. Carlsson· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.