Aug 2026· IEEE Symposium on Artificial Life· 0 citations
Abstract
Rosen’s metabolism–repair (M,R) systems have been debated for decades, yet their formal nature and crucially their physical realization remain unclear. Here we revisit the “grounding†problem and argues that many difficulties stem from overly literal identifications of Rosen’s sets and mappings with a specific subclass of biochemical entities (e.g., enzymes and substrates), which introduce arbitrariness and obscure the role of non-synthetic cellular processes.
We propose three interpretational changes. First, we replace molecules-as-primitives with reactive–structure units (RS units): physical building blocks that inseparably combine reactivity (capacity for chemical participation) and structure/bulk (spatial extension). In this view, the material domains of Rosen’s model (the A and B of his famous diagram) are configurations of RS units rather than curated lists of biochemical species. Second, we broaden the meaning of processes in (M,R) models beyond molecular transformations, accommodating mesoscale and physical phenomena (e.g., cytoskeletal dynamics, trafficking, secretion, macro-molecular interactions) that are essential for living organization. Third, we absorb all biosynthetic activity into the mapping f : A → B, leaving other mappings to capture higher-order, non-biosynthetic functionalities that enable persistence indirectly (e.g., homeostasis, defense, context management).
Overall, the reformulation shifts the emphasis from narrow self-synthesis to persistence: circular self-production supported by diverse ancillary processes, opening conceptual space for clearer groundings and for future formal development (e.g., via applied category theory).
The coherence of living systems extends beyond the lifespan of the individual organism: it persists across biological lineages, through the turnover of organisms and change across deep evolutionary time. This paper terms this phenomenon evolutionary coherence, the lineage-scale expression of a more general property, bi...
A. Nicolaides· Frontiers in Systems Biology· 0 citations
Origin-of-life research often asks how prebiotic chemistry assembled the components required for a minimal cell. This paper proposes a complementary network-dynamical model: minimal cells may arise not only by acquiring functions, but by shedding the environmental scaffolds that first supplied them. I model prebiotic o...
The origin of biological order remains one of the central unsolved problems in science. While substantial progress has been made in understanding the abiotic synthesis of biomolecules, no generally accepted mechanism explains how molecular organization emerged from prebiotic chemistry. Orgel [1] emphasized that the cru...
E. Fuchs, A. Paulitsch-Fuchs· Bio Systems· 0 citations
Chemistry has long relied on the premise that molecular structure dictates biological function. This paradigm becomes incomplete for systems whose speciation changes on the timescale of the biological response. For many bioactive metal systems, however, the structure-based description is necessary but not always suffic...
Reengineered biological systems have the potential to revolutionize chemical and material production, enhance critical mineral recovery, serve as threat sensors and improve human health. Unfortunately, the extreme complexity of organisms has made it difficult to achieve this potential in all but the simplest cases. Rec...
H. Wiley, A. Cintolesi, N. B. Chowdhury et al.· 0 citations
This review treats cancer as a multiscale adaptive system, asks what the framework must predict to be worth adopting, and separates at each scale what the evidence establishes from what is proposed. It is an expert narrative synthesis, not a systematic review, and states the limits of that design. Proton transfer and t...
M. C. Casotti, B. C. Ferreira, B. P. Campanharo et al.· Bio Systems· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.