Concordance Between a Generative Artificial Intelligence Model and a Hepatobiliary Multidisciplinary Team in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Management: A Retrospective Study.

C. Ciulli Emanuele Scarpa Pasquale Chiacchio A. Fogliati M. Scotti Antonio Ciaccio A. Rovere C. Cotsoglou R. Niespolo F. Elisei Michele Aprigliano L. Ripamonti M. Garancini F. Romano

Sep 2026 · Annals of Surgical Oncology · 0 citations · 15 references

Medicine

TL;DR

In HCC management, AI demonstrated a high level of agreement with expert MDT decisions, suggesting its potential role as a complementary decision-support tool, however, limitations persist for elderly patients and borderline clinical scenarios, in which individualized human judgment remains essential.

DOI PubMed Semantic Scholar

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Large Language Models in Multidisciplinary Decision-Making for Hepatopancreatobiliary Oncology: Retrospective Comparative Feasibility Study

LLM-generated treatment recommendations demonstrated moderate alignment with MDT decisions in HPB oncology, indicating that concordance alone is insufficient for evaluating LLMs as clinical decision support tools.

Jun-Jo Sung, Eui Hyuk Chong, Incheon Kang et al. · Journal of Medical Internet... · 0 citations

#small language model Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer multidisciplinary decision-making: concordance, predictive support and clinical translation

Current evidence is insufficient to establish improvements in MDT decision quality or patient outcomes, and AI should be regarded as a supervised support tool rather than a replacement for expert multidisciplinary judgment.

A. Nikitaras, S. M. Tsoti, M. Pramateftakis · Frontiers in Oncology · 0 citations

Open access Sep 2026

Large Language Models as Decision Support in Breast Cancer Management: A Comparison with Multidisciplinary Team Decision-Making

Background/Objectives: Breast cancer management relies on multidisciplinary team (MDT) decisions that integrate clinical, radiological, pathological, and patient-related factors. Large language models (LLMs) may support such decisions, but evidence based on real-world cases remains limited. Methods: We evaluated the ag...

G. Dindelegan, Noé Yoshi François Poupel, George Ionuț Golea et al. · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 0 citations

Open access Aug 2026

Multimodal artificial intelligence for personalized hepatocellular carcinoma treatment strategy selection

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment selection demands nuanced integration of heterogeneous patient data, yet prevailing predictive models rely on restricted data modalities and oversimplified therapeutic frameworks, compromising clinical translation. Objective We developed and validated a multimodal art...

W. Feng, S. Liu, Z. Yang et al. · medRxiv · 0 citations

Open access Sep 2026

AI-augmented colorectal cancer MDT concordance modelling: a prospective evaluation of performance, interpretability, and provider-side budget impact

Colorectal multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) face increasing workload. We evaluated whether routinely collected colorectal MDT variables could support local MDT concordance modelling, interpretable feature attribution, and provider-side budget impact estimation. Prospective observational cohort of 250 consecu...

Mohammed Hamid, Muhammad Mushtaq, Farhan Javed et al. · International Journal of Col... · 0 citations

Open access Aug 2026

Prospective multi-centre evaluation of guideline−based artificial intelligence to streamline multidisciplinary tumour board

Introduction Multidisciplinary tumour board (MTB) or tumour board (TB) is the “gold standard” for providing oncological patients’ diagnosis and treatment. Often, MTBs are time-intensive, capacity-constrained, and absent or inconsistent in many routine hospitals. Despite that, in MTB, a few experienced specialists in th...

O. Ivashchuk, S. Hovornyan · Frontiers in Oncology · 0 citations