A baseline morphological analyzer is built by evaluating a wider range of supervised systems, including lexicon-lookup, Conditional Random Fields (CRFs), full fine-tuning of Arabic PLMs, and AraT5 configurations, to demonstrate severe limitations in current capabilities.
Abstract
Arabic morphological analysis remains a central challenge for natural language processing (NLP). This challenge is embedded within the complex, rich, and multi-layered morphology of Arabic, where orthographic words encode enclitics, root-and-pattern derivations, and other morphosyntactic features. Another dimension of complexity is the coexistence of different varieties of Arabic, including Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), Classical Arabic (CA), and Dialectal Arabic (DA). In this four-phase empirical investigation of Arabic, a new, standardized CoNLL-U benchmark integrating the Arabella corpus (MSA) and the MASAQ corpus (CA) was evaluated across different settings. This paper aims to build a baseline morphological analyzer by evaluating a wider range of supervised systems, including lexicon-lookup, Conditional Random Fields (CRFs), full fine-tuning of Arabic PLMs, and AraT5 configurations. A parameter-efficient LoRA adaptation of QARiB was implemented, preserving most UPOS performance with minor differences. The results of the comparative evaluation of a variety of models across all settings were reported, and significant results were emphasized. The findings demonstrate severe limitations in current capabilities, particularly that cross-domain transfer for fine-grained language-specific tags (XPOS) remains difficult. Also, models struggle with the asymmetry of cross-register transfer, as moving from Classical to Modern Arabic exposes a lack of coverage for modern named entities and punctuation.
A resource-efficient adaptation of the English-pretrained ModernBERT for Arabic, employing continued pretraining on large Arabic corpora followed by lightweight head-only fine-tuning with a frozen encoder, demonstrating that modern English encoder architectures can be efficiently transferred to Arabic through language-...
Ahmed Samy Eldamaty, M. Abdelrahman, Mohamed Mostafa Ibrahim Elbehery et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
YallaMorph is introduced, a large-scale benchmark for Arabic morphological generation covering verbs, nouns, adjectives, their cliticized forms, and invalid configurations over 600K benchmark entries, which shows that Arabic morphological generation remains difficult.
Mahmoud Reda, Salam Khalifa, Reham M. Marzouk et al.· 0 citations
Progress in natural language processing (NLP) has primarily benefited high-resource languages. Although Arabic now has access to substantial corpora and widely used pretrained language models such as AraBERT and MARBERT, it still exhibits a significant imbalance, particularly in the availability of structured lexical–s...
Leila Nouri, H. Aliane· ACM Transactions on Asian an...· 0 citations
Part-of-speech (POS) tagging in Arabic is hard because its rich root-and-pattern morphology and the absence of short vowels make one unvoweled string compatible with many categories. This paper presents Jawhar, a hybrid framework that couples a high-performance morphological analyser with contextual reranking using a p...
Mohamed Bouzahir, A. A. Abdelouahad, M. Nabil· Information· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) often default to Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) when generating Arabic, even when prompted with dialectal Arabic. A natural explanation is that their internal representations are dominated by MSA. We test this hypothesis by adapting the language-dominance framework of Shani and Basirat (2025)...
Abdu Sallouh, Nicholas Popovic, Michael Färber· 0 citations
This work introduces EDRAC, the first large-scale benchmark for dialectal Arabic machine reading comprehension (MRC) and generative QA, covering five major dialects: Egyptian, Moroccan, Emirati, Syrian, and Saudi Arabic, and benchmarks Arabic-centric and multilingual LLMs on EDRAC using lexical and semantic metrics.
Noor Abo Mokh, K. Chirkunov, Teresa Lynn et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.