Skip to content
Review Open access

Protein Homeostasis Networks in Lymphoid Malignancies: Mechanisms of Proteostasis Addiction and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities

Aug 2026 · Lymphatics · Vol 4, pp. 43 · 1 citation · 113 references

TL;DR

Current and emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at disrupting proteostasis networks, including proteasome inhibitors, UPR-targeted agents, chaperone-directed therapies, and novel targeted protein degradation technologies are examined.

Abstract

Lymphoid malignancies comprise a diverse group of hematologic cancers characterized by extensive genetic, epigenetic, and microenvironmental heterogeneity. Despite substantial advances in targeted therapies and immunotherapeutic approaches, disease relapse and therapeutic resistance remain major clinical challenges. Increasing evidence suggests that malignant lymphoid cells are highly dependent on protein homeostasis (proteostasis) networks to cope with the elevated proteotoxic stress imposed by oncogenic signaling, rapid proliferation, immunoglobulin synthesis, and microenvironmental stressors. This dependence, often referred to as proteostasis addiction, represents a critical vulnerability that can be therapeutically exploited. Proteostasis is maintained through an integrated network that regulates protein synthesis, folding, quality control, and degradation. In lymphoid malignancies, dysregulation of these pathways drives adaptive responses involving molecular chaperones, the unfolded protein response (UPR), the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS), and autophagy–lysosome pathways. These mechanisms collectively enable tumor cells to survive conditions that would otherwise induce proteotoxic collapse and cell death. Notably, the clinical success of proteasome inhibitors in plasma cell neoplasms has provided proof of concept that targeting proteostasis can yield meaningful therapeutic benefit. In this review, we discuss the major sources of proteotoxic stress in lymphoid malignancies and summarize the molecular mechanisms that sustain proteostasis addiction. We further examine current and emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at disrupting proteostasis networks, including proteasome inhibitors, UPR-targeted agents, chaperone-directed therapies, and novel targeted protein degradation technologies. Finally, we highlight the contribution of proteostasis remodeling to therapeutic resistance and discuss future opportunities for biomarker development and precision medicine. A deeper understanding of proteostasis dependencies may facilitate the identification of novel therapeutic vulnerabilities and improve outcomes for patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

How Cancer Cells Exploit Unfolded Protein Response Signaling for Survival, Metastasis, and Therapy Resistance

This review summarizes how the three canonical UPR branches establish a persistent adaptive state under chronic ER stress and discusses the molecular mechanisms by which UPR signaling maintains proteostasis, reprograms cellular metabolism, alleviates oxidative stress, and coordinates autophagy.

Zihe Zhou · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Chaperone-mediated autophagy as a regulator of hallmarks of cancer

Current evidence is brought together to provide a comprehensive understanding of how CMA contributes to the Hallmarks of Cancer, including sustained proliferative signaling, resistance to cell death, metabolic reprogramming, invasion and metastasis, immune evasion, and the enabling characteristics of genome instability...

Meenakshi Tiwari, Lokendra Kumar Sharma, Bandana Chakravarti et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Metabolic Reprogramming in Gastric Cancer Immunity Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications

The metabolic supply-demand mismatch explains why certain interventions can revive effector cells while potentially harming other cell types, and the need for spatially resolved metabolic profiling, biomarker-driven patient stratification, and personalized therapies to overcome metabolic immunosuppression and improve c...

Xiang-Yang Wang, Ying Wu, Yu-Tong Fu et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Metabolic and epigenetic plasticity of tumor-associated macrophages shapes immunosuppressive outputs and immune checkpoint response.

A context-dependent state-transition model is proposed in which pressures are decoded by interconnected nutrient- and stress-sensing pathways, integrated through mitochondrial bioenergetic and redox adaptation, and translated by metabolite-dependent chromatin remodeling into persistent TAM functional programs that cons...

Jing-Hao Pan, Bo-Yang Li, Lucy Yue Lau et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Mitochondrial dysfunction as a metabolic checkpoint of immunotherapy response in colorectal cancer

Immunotherapy has markedly improved outcomes across multiple cancer types; however, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains largely refractory, with meaningful responses mostly restricted to tumors harboring deficient mismatch repair and high microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H), which represent only a small fraction of CRC...

Lorenzo Tomassini, M. Colella, G. Monteleone et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Apoptosis in Cancer: From Threat to Therapy

Apoptosis is a tightly regulated form of programmed cell death essential for tissue homeostasis and genomic integrity. Its dysregulation contributes to diverse pathological conditions, particularly cancer, where evasion of apoptosis enables malignant transformation, tumour progression, immune escape, and therapeutic re...

Akhila Chagalamari, Gaurav Rangari, Bhaskar S. Rao et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.