Skip to content
Open access

Early Versus Delayed Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With NSTEMI and Stable Heart Failure.

Sep 2026 · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions · 0 citations · 15 references
Medicine

TL;DR

In patients with NSTEMI and stable HF, early PCI was associated with higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, warranting further investigation in this understudied subgroup.

Abstract

Background

Early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to improve outcomes in certain high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), but its optimal timing in those with stable heart failure (HF) remains unclear.

Aim

We aimed to compared 1 month and 1 year cardiovascular outcomes between early (< 24 h) and delayed (≥ 24 h) PCI in patients with NSTEMI with stable HF.

Methods

We identified adults with both NSTEMI and HF in TriNetX, then divided them based on PCI timing. We excluded patients with decompensated HF, STEMI, or pregnancy. Cohorts were then balanced using propensity-score matching, with standardized mean difference < 0.1. Our primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, HF exacerbation, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). Secondary outcomes included individual primary outcome components, acute kidney injury, and major bleeding. Outcomes were assessed at 1 month and 1 year, expressed as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

After matching, we included 2249 patients in each cohort. After PSM, the mean age of the early PCI cohort was 69.3 ± 11.5 years, while that of the delayed PCI cohort was 69.2 ± 11.7 years, with 35% women. Hypertension (84.8%), hyperlipidemia (67.2%), and diabetes mellitus (53.1%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. Patients included both HF with preserved and reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF). Early PCI was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome at both 1 month (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.15-1.31, p < 0.01) and 1 year (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07-1.18, p < 0.01), compared with delayed PCI. Early PCI was associated with higher risk of recurrent MI at both time points, while risk of all-cause mortality and VT/VF were similar. Risk of HF exacerbation was higher with early PCI at 1 month but was comparable at 1 year.

Conclusion

In patients with NSTEMI and stable HF, early PCI was associated with higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, warranting further investigation in this understudied subgroup.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Three-Year Outcomes Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Introduction: To identify the safety and long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD) and to compare outcomes between provisional single-stent and double-stent techniques. Methods: In this observational study, patien...

K. N. O. Aljabry, Samir Taha Abeid, Y. A. Yasseen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Outcome evaluation of percutaneous coronary intervention vs medical therapy alone in patients with chronic coronary syndrome

This study provides real-world evidence by comparing the long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus medical therapy alone in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) diagnosed non-invasively, given the lack of evidence in this population. This retrospective cohort study (2013–20...

Hsien-Yuan Chang, Hsin-Yu Fang, Mu-Shiang Huang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Twelve-Month Clinical Outcomes of Multivessel Versus Culprit-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Hemodynamically Stable Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study

Objective: This study compared 12-month clinical outcomes following multivessel primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and culprit-only PCI among hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) treated at a tertiary care car...

Zeeshan Ahmad, K. Hassan, Tariq Rahim et al. · 1 citation
Open access Sep 2026

P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection and Ischemic Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Real-World Registry Analysis

This study evaluated whether ticagrelor use is associated with improved ischemic outcomes compared with clopidogrel in Korean patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We analyzed patient-level data from 1,199 patients (614 clopidogrel, 585 ticagrelor) enrolled in two prospect...

Donghyeon Joo, Jeong Tae Byoun, Sungho Jo et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

After-Hours Versus In-Hours Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

Findings underscore the need for the continued development of shock management paradigms and strategic deployment of emerging treatments in AMI-CS, with in-hospital mortality remaining high over the past decade irrespective of procedure timing.

Riley J. Batchelor, D. Dinh, Angela Brennan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2025

Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Versus Non-left Main Coronary Artery in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comparative Study

Background and objective: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS), particularly those affecting the left main coronary artery (LMCA), are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The objective of the present study was to investigate long-term outcomes in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for A...

S. M. Mamun Iqbal, A. M. Shafique, Neuton Mondal et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.