Skip to content
Review Open access

Beyond Clinical Outcomes: A Patient-Centered Decision Support Tool for Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment

Aug 2026 · JU Open Plus · Vol 4 · 0 citations · 19 references

TL;DR

A patient-centric tool to compare patient- and caregiver-level outcomes across common localized PCa management strategies to inform shared decision-making and counseling and supports point-of-care counseling by quantifying patient- and caregiver-relevant tradeoffs in costs, time burden, and functional outcomes across localized PCa strategies.

Abstract

Shared decision-making for localized prostate cancer (PCa) requires balancing oncologic control with functional outcomes and the patient and caregiver burden of care. Existing economic tools emphasize payer costs or direct out-of-pocket expenses and rarely quantify indirect burden (eg, missed work, travel) or caregiver disruption. We developed a patient-centric tool to compare patient- and caregiver-level outcomes across common localized PCa management strategies to inform shared decision-making and counseling. We developed the tool from a US patient perspective comparing active surveillance, irreversible electroporation, radiotherapy, and radical prostatectomy over 1- and 5-year horizons. Inputs were derived from peer-reviewed literature, guidelines, payer fee schedules/policies, and gray sources. Patient cost-sharing was estimated for Original Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Commercial coverage. Indirect burden inputs were sourced from published data and national statistics. Assumptions were informed by input from a board-certified urologist and reviewed by a patient advocate. The tool spans pre-, peri-, and post-treatment follow-up. User-selected parameters include time horizon, insurance type, site of care, and active surveillance progression at year 5. Outputs include patient out-of-pocket costs (medical and indirect), patient and caregiver missed workdays and wage loss, 1-year complication rates, and 1- and 5-year progression-free survival. Scenario testing demonstrated appropriate responsiveness to insurance type, site of care, and disease trajectory. This tool supports point-of-care counseling by quantifying patient- and caregiver-relevant tradeoffs in costs, time burden, and functional outcomes across localized PCa strategies.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Healthcare System Drivers of Prostate Cancer Disparities: Real-World Evidence, Informatics Pathways, and Policy Translation

Background: Racial and socioeconomic differences in prostate cancer outcomes are often described as survival disparities, but observed differences may also reflect healthcare access, treatment delivery, and resource allocation. Methods: NCDB and SEER–Medicare were treated as independent, complementary retrospective dat...

Chen Yang, Ze-Lin Guo, Fan Cheng et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Patient and primary care clinician perspectives on polygenic risk scores for prostate cancer screening: a national qualitative study.

PURPOSE Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have been proposed as adjuncts to clinical risk prediction for prostate cancer, but little is known about patient-centered implementation of PRS-informed shared decision-making (SDM). We explored patients' and primary care clinicians' perspectives on using PRS in SDM about prostate c...

M. Clayman, L. Cheam, C. Gillespie et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Conversations in rectal cancer treatment: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary clinician perspective into non-operative management decision-making discussions

Structured, phase-specific communication and improved interprofessional alignment may strengthen shared decision-making in this preference-sensitive context over time under clinical uncertainty and across specialties.

E. Alagoz, Diana Gutierrez-Meza, A. D. De Roo · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Oncology Patients in Clinical Trials: A Health Care Cost Analysis.

OBJECTIVES To assess health care resource utilization and costs among commercially insured patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or ovarian cancer (OC) participating in clinical trials (PCTs). STUDY DESIGN A retrospective claims analysis from 2017 to 2022 was conducted using the Milliman Consolidated Health Cost Guid...

Christine Ferro, Kate Fitch, Prachi D. Bhatt et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Primary care physician documentation in oncology electronic health records: prognostic marker or immortal-time bias?

Background Structured administrative fields in oncology electronic health records (EHRs) are used in studies but their interpretation may depend on when they are completed. We assessed whether dated primary care physician (PCP) documentation was associated with survival after accounting for documentation timing. Materi...

P. Heudel, J. Blay · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Survey and Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Instruments for Assessing Out-of-Pocket Costs and Financial Toxicity in Cancer Care: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES Out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and financial toxicity remain significant barriers to equitable cancer care globally. This review systematically identifies and compares survey-based approaches used to measure patient- and household-level OOP expenditures and financial burden across diverse cancer settings. METHO...

S. Foo, Jing-Sheng Lim, A. V. Thakumar et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.