Skip to content
Review Open access

Development and Content Validation of a Belgian Patient Decision Aid for Surgical Decision-making in Rectal Cancer: A Double-modified Delphi Study.

Sep 2026 · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · pp. 152356 · 0 citations · 24 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The Belgian-adapted PDA demonstrated satisfactory content validity within the participating Belgian panels and is intended to complement professional counselling and support shared decision-making.

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to adapt an existing Canadian patient decision aid (PDA) for rectal cancer surgery to the Belgian healthcare context and to evaluate its content validity for patients considering low anterior resection (LAR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR).

Methods

The PDA was updated through a literature review addressing surgical techniques and quality-of-life outcomes. Two modified Delphi studies, each comprising two rounds, were conducted in Belgium. Phase 1 included clinical and research experts and rectal cancer survivors from one university hospital. Phase 2 involved clinical and research experts from one university hospital and two general hospitals. Participants rated each PDA section for relevance, understandability, completeness, and correctness using a four-point Likert scale. Item-level and scale-level Content Validity Indices were calculated.

Results

The Belgian-adapted PDA comprised nine sections covering rectal cancer, surgical options, quality-of-life consequences, costs, and personal considerations. In both phases, the overall PDA achieved an S-CVI/Ave of at least 0.90 for relevance, understandability, completeness, and correctness. The cost section was revised following changes in Belgian ostomy reimbursement criteria.

Conclusion

The Belgian-adapted PDA demonstrated satisfactory content validity within the participating Belgian panels. It is intended to complement professional counselling and support shared decision-making. Further research should evaluate its feasibility, implementation, and effects in clinical practice. Adaptation and local validation are required before use outside Belgium. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE In nurse-led clinics, clinical nurse specialists may use the PDA to structure discussions and support patients in considering surgical options in relation to their preferences and values.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Conversations in rectal cancer treatment: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary clinician perspective into non-operative management decision-making discussions

Structured, phase-specific communication and improved interprofessional alignment may strengthen shared decision-making in this preference-sensitive context over time under clinical uncertainty and across specialties.

E. Alagoz, Diana Gutierrez-Meza, A. D. De Roo · 0 citations
Review Open access Feb 2026

Development, simplification, and prospective methodological exploration of a Chinese endoscopy patient experience scale and a decision support system

Background and Objective Chinese-language patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) for gastrointestinal endoscopy remain limited. We developed and psychometrically evaluated a 54-item Endoscopy Patient Experience Scale (EPES) for Chinese patients; because the field survey had a valid-response rate of 99.28% (965/97...

Chengcheng Gao, Xi-Chen Chen, Yan Wang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Large Language Models as Decision Support in Breast Cancer Management: A Comparison with Multidisciplinary Team Decision-Making

Background/Objectives: Breast cancer management relies on multidisciplinary team (MDT) decisions that integrate clinical, radiological, pathological, and patient-related factors. Large language models (LLMs) may support such decisions, but evidence based on real-world cases remains limited. Methods: We evaluated the ag...

G. Dindelegan, Noé Yoshi François Poupel, George Ionuț Golea et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Real-world implementation of a decision aid for treatment decisions in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a prospective multicenter study across expert centers.

BACKGROUND Treatment decisions in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) involve complex trade-offs between survival benefits and treatment burden. Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial but challenging in emotionally charged and time-pressured consultations. This study evaluated the real-world implementation of...

M. Graus, Thijmen H. T. Broekman, S. V. van Nassau et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.