Sep 2026· European journal of dental education· 0 citations· 28 references
Medicine
TL;DR
While LLMs show strong potential in supporting dental education through standardised exams, their performance varies by model and question type, and further improvements are needed to enhance reliability across different dental disciplines.
Abstract
Aim
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an integral part of dental education and clinical practice. While several studies have assessed the performance of ChatGPT in medical exams, comparative analyses of various large language models (LLMs) in dentistry remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of five prominent AI models in answering clinical questions from Turkey's dental specialty examination (DUS).
Materials And Methods
A total of 1026 clinical science questions from 13 DUS examinations (2012-2021) were used to test the accuracy of five LLMs: ChatGPT-5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek-R1, and Grok 4. Questions were categorized by specialty and format (information-based vs. case-based). Each question was entered once, and responses were scored against official answer keys. Statistical analyses included chi-square and Z tests with Bonferroni correction.
Results
Accuracy scores ranged from 79.2% to 90.6%. Gemini 3.5 Flash and ChatGPT-5 achieved the highest overall accuracy rates (90.6% and 88.2%, respectively). Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek-R1, and Grok 4 demonstrated significantly lower performance (p < 0.001). Accuracy rates varied across examination years and dental specialties. The highest performance was observed in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Paediatric Dentistry, Periodontology, and Restorative Dentistry, whereas Prosthetic Dentistry, Orthodontics, and Endodontics yielded comparatively lower accuracy rates. Significant differences among AI models were observed for both information-based (p < 0.001) and case-based questions (p = 0.029).
Conclusion
While LLMs show strong potential in supporting dental education through standardised exams, their performance varies by model and question type. Gemini 3.5 Flash and ChatGPT-5 achieved the highest and most consistent accuracy rates, whereas Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek-R1, and Grok 4 showed lower performance. Advanced LLMs may represent useful supplementary tools for dental education and DUS preparation, although further improvements are needed to enhance reliability across different dental disciplines.
Objective: Although the integration of large language models (LLMs) into dental education is rapidly increasing, their actual performance in domain-specific assessments remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of four LLMs (ChatGPT-4.0, Gemini Advanced 1.5 Pro, DeepSeek-V3, and Perplexity)...
LLMs demonstrate strong potential as supportive tools in dental education, particularly for text-based knowledge assessment, but their limited performance in visual question contexts highlights an important constraint for their integration into image-dependent domains such as dental diagnostics.
S. Taşyapan, Didem Özer· European journal of dental e...· 0 citations
Under standardized, single-attempt Turkish DUS testing conditions, the evaluated consumer AI interfaces showed materially different accuracy across the full dataset and exploratory discipline- and format-based subgroups.
Fatih Karaaslan, Muhammed Halil Yilan, Merve Tirimoğulları· BMC Oral Health· 0 citations
All three large language models demonstrated high accuracy on operative dentistry MCQs, suggesting their potential utility as a supplementary educational tool, however, the residual error rates in the answers warrant the cautious integration of LLMs into dental education.
J. M. Antony, Nikhil Harikrishnan, N. Jayasheelan· Frontiers in Dental Medicine· 0 citations
The presence of multiple visual materials significantly reduced accuracy, with panoramic radiographs and dental models showing the strongest negative effects and the development of multimodal models capable of integrating both text and images.
H. Fukuda, M. Morishita, O. Takahashi et al.· International Journal of Ora...· 0 citations
G Gemini demonstrated superior clinical precision and safety, whereas Claude provided more comprehensive and readable explanations, which support the integration of LLMs as pragmatic, high-ecological-validity complementary tools for patient education, while emphasizing the persistent necessity for professional clinical...
Ramazan Ağırağaç, Vedat Yüksekkaya· Journal of Stomatology Oral...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.