Skip to content
Open access

Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Global Acetabular Overcoverage Shows Significant 5-Year Improvements but Poses a Higher Risk of Revision Surgery Compared With Matched Controls.

Sep 2026 · Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopy And Related · 0 citations · 26 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tears in patients with radiographic evidence of GO shows significant improvements in PROs at a minimum 5-year follow-up, however, it carries a 2-fold increased relative risk of revision hip arthroscopy compared with that of the control group.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate minimum 5-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tears in patient with global acetabular overcoverage (GO), with a secondary comparison of outcomes to a propensity-matched control group without GO.

Methods

Prospectively collected data was analyzed for all patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between 2008 and 2020. Patients were included if they completed the preoperative and minimum 5-year postoperative questionnaires for at least 1 of the following PROs: modified Harris Hip Score, Non-Arthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale, Visual Analog Scale, and patient satisfaction or reaching an endpoint (revision hip arthroscopy or total hip arthroplasty). Patients with radiographic findings of GO on the anteroposterior pelvis radiograph (lateral center-edge angle ≥40°) and coxa profunda were included in the GO cohort and were propensity-matched to controls without coxa profunda and with a lateral center-edge angle between 25° and 39° in a 1:3 ratio based on age, sex, body mass index, acetabular Outerbridge grade, labral, and capsular treatment.

Results

Two hundred four patients were included: 51 in the GO group and 153 matched controls. The GO cohort showed significant improvements across all PROs (P < .001). Compared with the control group, similar magnitudes of improvement and postoperative scores for all PROs were observed, reaching minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state at similar rates. The GO group had a higher frequency of revision hip arthroscopy (15.69% vs 7.84%; relative risk = 2.00) with similar rates of total hip arthroplasty-free survivorship.

Conclusions

Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tears in patients with radiographic evidence of GO shows significant improvements in PROs at a minimum 5-year follow-up. However, it carries a 2-fold increased relative risk of revision hip arthroscopy compared with that of the control group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

EP8.21 Minimum Five-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients with Global Acetabular Overcoverage and Coxa Profunda Compared to Controls

Abstract Background Global acetabular overcoverage (GO) represents one anatomic condition that predisposes individuals to hip pathology by increasing the risk of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The mid-term outcomes for this patient population remain limited. Purpose (1) Evaluate minimum 5-year patient-reported out...

Roger Quesada-Jimenez, A. Maldonado, Kavya Bomma et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Recovery Curves After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Are Slower for Patients With Severe Ligamentous Laxity: A Propensity-Matched Study.

PURPOSE To evaluate the patient-reported outcome recovery trajectories of generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL) patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears from preoperative to short- to mid-term follow-up and to compare these results to a propensity-matched control group witho...

Dharma H. Patel, Roger Quesada-Jimenez, Wonjin Ko et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

FP10.3 Durable Improvement with Revision Hip Arthroscopy at 10-Year Minimum Follow-Up: A Matched Comparison to Primary Hip Arthroscopy Controls

Abstract ICLA10 - Unraveling the Failure: Diagnostic Algorithms and Why Hip Preservation Fails, Auditorium A (BMCC Level 1), October 9, 2026, 10:30 - 12:30 Purpose To report 10-year minimum patient-reported outcomes of patients under revision hip arthroscopy and compare their outcomes to a propensity matched cohort of...

Andrew R. Schab, K. Patel, Kavya Bomma et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Outcomes of Capsular Plication as Part of Hip Arthroscopic Management for Surgically Identified Microinstability Are Comparable to Outcomes in Matched Controls.

PURPOSE To compare 2-year minimum outcomes of hip arthroscopic management with capsular plication in patients with microinstability with propensity-matched controls. METHODS We searched primary hip arthroscopies undertaken between August 2009 and December 2020 from a single-surgeon database, excluding those with late...

Catherine J. Bacon, Rowan P. Auchterlonie, R. Woodward et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

FP9.5 Prior Hip Arthroscopy Is Associated with Worse Outcomes and Decreased Satisfaction after Total Hip Arthroplasty in Non-arthritic Female Patients: a Comparative Study

Abstract ICLB09 - The Revision Playbook: Advanced Execution and Technical Rescues in Failed Preservation, Session Room 6 (BMCC Level 3), October 9, 2026, 10:30 - 12:30 Purpose To compare one-year patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young adult female patients wit...

Robert Kollmorgen, Thomas Ellis, Josh Harris et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

EP3.44 Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy Without Capsular Repair: A 15-Year Follow-Up Study

Abstract Purpose Hip arthroscopy is an established treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Although capsular repair is now commonly performed to restore hip stability and optimize biomechanics, its importance was less recognized 10–15 years ago. As a result, long-term outcomes after arthroscopy with...

Samy Shelbaya, Mallory Ehlers, Layne C. Estes et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.