Skip to content

Supporting AI Readiness Through Digital Workflows in Materials Science

Sep 2026 · Advanced Engineering Materials · 1 citation · 41 references
Machine Learning in Materials Science

TL;DR

This article examines 13 workflow contributions from the second and third funding phases of the MaterialDigital initiative and shows how workflows support AI‐ready research both through integrated AI methods and through structured, traceable, and reusable pipelines.

Abstract

Materials science produces heterogeneous data across experiments, simulations, and industrial processes that often remain bound to local formats, manual procedures, and project‐specific software. Digital workflows address this fragmentation through explicit, repeatable, and machine‐actionable pipelines. This article examines 13 workflow contributions from the second and third funding phases of the MaterialDigital initiative. The contributions cover data acquisition and FAIR storage, simulation automation, multiscale integration, and AI/ML‐driven optimization. Here, AI‐readiness denotes the documented capacity of workflows and their artifacts to be reliably interpreted, executed, assessed, reused, and, where intended, invoked or adapted by automated systems; it does not require the direct application of artificial intelligence. Eight comparison aspects capture data and metadata, reusable artifacts, orchestration, robustness, cross‐scale coupling, transfer validation, learning and optimization, and adaptive or agent‐accessible operation. By distinguishing demonstrated capabilities from plans, the comparison shows how workflows support AI‐ready research both through integrated AI methods and through structured, traceable, and reusable pipelines. Across the projects, stable data structures, persistent artifacts, executable orchestration, and scientific validation recur as foundations, whereas adaptive operation and agent‐accessible interfaces remain specialized. Wider interoperability would additionally benefit from shared interfaces and explicit, portable descriptions of workflow artifacts.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2025

Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...

Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee · 112 citations · ⚡10

The Death of Schema Linking? Text-to-SQL in the Age of Well-Reasoned Language Models

This work revisits schema linking when using the latest generation of large language models (LLMs) and finds empirically that newer models are adept at utilizing relevant schema elements during generation even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant ones.

Karime Maamari, Fadhil Abubaker, Daniel Jaroslawicz et al. · 109 citations · ⚡19

BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models

A novel threat is unveiled in which attackers steer the RAG system's response by injecting malicious passages into its knowledge base, enabling the attacker to steer the response without altering the user input or modifying the RAG weights.

Jiaqi Xue, Meng Zheng, Yebowen Hu et al. · 109 citations · ⚡8

PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection

Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.

Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al. · 73 citations · ⚡4

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.