Skip to content
Open access

Knowledge and Information in Epistemic Dynamics

Aug 2026 · OBM Neurobiology · Vol 010, pp. 1-12 · 0 citations · 15 references

TL;DR

A general axiomatic definition of a cognitive system, along with its corresponding epistemic information measure, and it is demonstrated that Shannon’s source information, artificial neural networks, and formal logical theories are all concrete realizations of this unified framework.

Abstract

This paper proposes a general theory of cognitive systems that inverts the conventional relationship between information and knowledge. While classical approaches define knowledge as the byproduct of processed information, we establish knowledge as a primitive concept and formulate information as a measure emerging from the process of assimilating knowledge. The epistemic measure of information provides a formal counterpart to Piaget’s assimilation-accommodation paradigm, expressed in terms of knowledge encoding costs. We present a general axiomatic definition of a cognitive system, along with its corresponding epistemic information measure, and demonstrate that Shannon’s source information, artificial neural networks, and formal logical theories are all concrete realizations of this unified framework. A central theoretical result is the proof of the Epistemic Inaccessibility Theorem, which establishes an intrinsic form of cognitive incompleteness. As a major consequence, we prove Gödel’s First Incompleteness Theorem for Peano Arithmetic directly from epistemic inaccessibility. Finally, we discuss the role of multi-level knowledge encodings, highlighting how artificial intelligence and Large Language Models suggest new avenues for modeling reflexivity, reasoning, and autonomous cognitive evolution.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Rethinking Mathematical Knowledge: A Nativist Approach

This paper develops a nativist approach to mathematical knowledge as an alternative account within the philosophy of mathematics. Rather than beginning with the ontological status of mathematical objects, it argues that any satisfactory account of mathematical knowledge should address three closely related questions: h...

An-An Zhou, Yue Liu · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

Merging Beliefs and Counterfactuals

We present a unified framework for modeling agents’ epistemic states and counterfactual conditionals. The novelty of our approach lies at the semantic level. We introduce a computationally grounded semantics in which an agent’s doxastic accessibility relation, needed to model the standard notion of deductively closed...

E. Lorini, Dmitry Rozplokhas · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Quantifying Meaning: A Review of Semantic Information Analysis, Uncertainties, and Possibilistic Restrictions in Hybrid Systems

Classical information theory, originating with Shannon’s foundational work [1], treats information as a purely syntactic quantity divorced from meaning. Intelligent systems operating in real-world environments must nonetheless process semantic content carried in natural language — content permeated by vagueness, fuzzin...

Jayesh Vijay Rao Karanjgaonkar · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Knowledge, scientifi c knowledge and objectivity

Th e paper aims to uncover theoretical foundations that enable a constructive analysis of a wide range of concepts of knowledge. Th e key concept is normativity, as defi ned by H. Ginsborg, grounded in the recognition of how we ought to go on, understood in terms of recognizing the uses of expressions as conforming wit...

N. Golovko · 0 citations

Logical Models of Informational Cascades

It is concluded that cascades are not only likely to occur but are sometimes unavoidable by “rational” means: in some situations, the group’s inability to track the truth is the direct consequence of each agent’s rational attempt at individual truth-tracking.

Unknown authors · 0 citations

Logical Models of Informational Cascades

It is concluded that cascades are not only likely to occur but are sometimes unavoidable by “rational” means: in some situations, the group’s inability to track the truth is the direct consequence of each agent’s rational attempt at individual truth-tracking.

Unknown authors · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.