Aug 2026· OBM Neurobiology· Vol 010, pp. 1-12· 0 citations· 15 references
TL;DR
A general axiomatic definition of a cognitive system, along with its corresponding epistemic information measure, and it is demonstrated that Shannon’s source information, artificial neural networks, and formal logical theories are all concrete realizations of this unified framework.
Abstract
This paper proposes a general theory of cognitive systems that inverts the conventional relationship between information and knowledge. While classical approaches define knowledge as the byproduct of processed information, we establish knowledge as a primitive concept and formulate information as a measure emerging from the process of assimilating knowledge. The epistemic measure of information provides a formal counterpart to Piaget’s assimilation-accommodation paradigm, expressed in terms of knowledge encoding costs. We present a general axiomatic definition of a cognitive system, along with its corresponding epistemic information measure, and demonstrate that Shannon’s source information, artificial neural networks, and formal logical theories are all concrete realizations of this unified framework. A central theoretical result is the proof of the Epistemic Inaccessibility Theorem, which establishes an intrinsic form of cognitive incompleteness. As a major consequence, we prove Gödel’s First Incompleteness Theorem for Peano Arithmetic directly from epistemic inaccessibility. Finally, we discuss the role of multi-level knowledge encodings, highlighting how artificial intelligence and Large Language Models suggest new avenues for modeling reflexivity, reasoning, and autonomous cognitive evolution.
This paper develops a nativist approach to mathematical knowledge as an alternative account within the philosophy of mathematics. Rather than beginning with the ontological status of mathematical objects, it argues that any satisfactory account of mathematical knowledge should address three closely related questions: h...
We present a unified framework for modeling
agents’ epistemic states and counterfactual conditionals.
The novelty of our approach lies at the
semantic level. We introduce a computationally
grounded semantics in which an agent’s doxastic
accessibility relation, needed to model the standard
notion of deductively closed...
E. Lorini, Dmitry Rozplokhas· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
Classical information theory, originating with Shannon’s foundational work [1], treats information as a purely syntactic quantity divorced from meaning. Intelligent systems operating in real-world environments must nonetheless process semantic content carried in natural language — content permeated by vagueness, fuzzin...
Jayesh Vijay Rao Karanjgaonkar· International Journal of Mat...· 0 citations
Th e paper aims to uncover theoretical foundations that enable a constructive analysis of a wide range of concepts of knowledge. Th e key concept is normativity, as defi ned by H. Ginsborg, grounded in the recognition of how we ought to go on, understood in terms of recognizing the uses of expressions as conforming wit...
N. Golovko· Siberian Journal of Philosop...· 0 citations
It is concluded that cascades are not only likely to occur but are sometimes unavoidable by “rational” means: in some situations, the group’s inability to track the truth is the direct consequence of each agent’s rational attempt at individual truth-tracking.
It is concluded that cascades are not only likely to occur but are sometimes unavoidable by “rational” means: in some situations, the group’s inability to track the truth is the direct consequence of each agent’s rational attempt at individual truth-tracking.
Unknown authors· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.