OneWorld, a shared-mechanism counterfactual generation framework that jointly models multiple action-conditioned futures under a common latent physical mechanism, is proposed and experiments show that OneWorld improves cross-intervention physical consistency while maintaining competitive single-rollout prediction quality.
Abstract
Action-conditioned video world models aim to predict scene evolution under different actions, a capability that is essential for reliable planning, decision-making, and interaction in dynamic environments. However, futures generated independently from the same initial scene may each appear plausible while implying incompatible physical properties, such as friction or mass. This inconsistency can lead to contradictory predictions across interventions, making it difficult for the model to maintain a coherent understanding of the underlying world and limiting its reliability for planning and decision-making. To address these issues, we propose OneWorld, a shared-mechanism counterfactual generation framework that jointly models multiple action-conditioned futures under a common latent physical mechanism. A physical mechanism interpreter first infers a distribution over latent mechanisms from each action-outcome branch. These distributions are then aggregated into shared-world evidence, which captures whether the branches admit a common physical explanation while accounting for uncertainty in less informative branches. This evidence constrains flow training and guides sampling, encouraging consistency in the underlying physical mechanism while preserving the distinct outcomes induced by different actions. We further introduce a multi-intervention evaluation protocol in controlled environments, following the interaction settings of ACWM-Phys, to assess whether generated futures can be jointly explained by the same physical parameters, alongside standard measures of single-rollout prediction quality. Experiments in these environments show that OneWorld improves cross-intervention physical consistency while maintaining competitive single-rollout prediction quality.
World models promise a general route to embodied intelligence: learn predictive dynamics once, then reason, plan, and act with them. Increasingly, the representations beneath such models are pretrained on large-scale video, interaction, and multimodal corpora, which raises a question prediction quality alone cannot ans...
CF-WAM is proposed, a dynamic next-state prediction framework that samples visual, semantic, geometric, and interaction projections of the same future, standardizes them into a common video form, and supervises a unified WAM across these projections.
Ting-Yu Yuan, Zi-Ming Ji, Biao-Liang Guan et al.· 1 citation
This work studies action-conditioned predictors built on five frozen self-supervised visual backbones, finding that a world model guides action selection reliably only when the goal lies within, or slightly beyond, the trajectory it imagines during planning.
A. Alrasheed, Basim Azam, Naveed Akhtar· 0 citations
This framework surveys manipulation, navigation, locomotion, autonomous driving, and general embodied learning, tracing technical progressions, clarifying capability requirements, and examining datasets, benchmarks, and evaluation protocols.
Nan-Jie Yao, Hao Wang, Chong Cheng et al.· 1 citation
This work proposes a compatibility prediction Latent World Model for robot navigation that predicts action-conditioned latent feature compatibility rather than reconstructing observations and demonstrates how the learned world model can supervise policy learning from unlabeled video data and improve policies through re...
Latent world models based on Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) are deterministic by design. While successful in fully observable scenarios, this paradigm breaks down when past observations and actions lead to multiple plausible future possibilities, e.g., due to occlusion. We introduce EpicWorldModel, a fr...
Bo-Wen Feng, Julian Ost, May Mei et al.· 0 citations
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.