This work investigates when and how JEPAs can recover the underlying causal states from observations, and establishes identifiability conditions under which representations learned by this general objective recover the underlying latent causal states up to component-wise invertible transformations and permutation.
Abstract
Recent empirical and theoretical advances suggest that joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPAs) may learn meaningful representations for action-conditioned prediction of future outcomes, thus becoming one of the foundational structures for world models. However, accurate prediction does not, in general, necessarily imply recovery of underlying causal states that give rise to the observed dynamics. This work investigates when and how JEPAs can recover the underlying causal states from observations. We first introduce a latent variable model, in which high-dimensional observations are generated from latent causal states whose dynamics are governed by action-conditioned transition mechanisms. Based on this formulation, we develop a general information-theoretic objective that combines conditional likelihood maximization for learning transition dynamics with entropy maximization for preserving latent state information. We then establish identifiability conditions under which representations learned by this general objective recover the underlying latent causal states up to component-wise invertible transformations and permutation. One key condition for such identifiability is sufficient action-induced variation in the transition mechanisms. Guided by this finding, we instantiate the general objective with an action-modulated Gaussian additive-noise model, yielding action-modulated JEPA (A-JEPA). Experiments on synthetic environments verify the theoretical findings under the identifiability conditions and robustness to moderate violations, while visual benchmarks demonstrate improved state recovery and transfer to unseen transition mechanisms.
PSG-JEPA is proposed, a physically grounded JEPA world model that shapes its latent space with two complementary grounding objectives beyond forward prediction: grounding individual latents in robot proprioceptive state, and grounding latent pairs in multi-horizon joint-angle changes.
This work introduces the Counterfactual Quotient Model, which treats action-conditioned futures as equivalent when they differ only by a component shared across actions, and establishes the decision sufficiency, identifiability, common-mode invariance, approximation behavior, and regret properties of the resulting repr...
This work introduces Counterfactual Latent World Models (CLWM), which combine a recurrent belief-state encoder, action-conditioned latent dynamics, and a contrastive counterfactual objective that separates futures induced by distinct interventions even when their observations look alike.
Method, a latent world-modeling framework based on orthogonal predictive factorization, is introduced, a latent world-modeling framework based on orthogonal predictive factorization that can be used by a readout, decoder, planner, or autoregressive rollout of an underlying system.
Latent world models predict the consequences of actions, but accurate prediction does not guarantee that latent distance reflects which candidate will execute successfully. We identify a decision-local prediction gap: among the few futures competing for execution, a candidate predicted closer to the goal can produce a...
Shuai-Jun Liu, Cheng-Ju Wu, Qi-Fu Wen et al.· 0 citations
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.