Skip to content

Regularizing modality contribution drift in multimodal continual learning

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.27260 · 0 citations · 34 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Continual Modality Contribution Drift Regularization (CMCDR) is proposed to preserve the modality contribution profiles of previously learned tasks in both replay-based and replay-free settings to mitigate forgetting in MMCL.

Abstract

Multimodal continual learning (MMCL) aims to acquire new knowledge from multimodal data while retaining previously learned knowledge. Existing MMCL methods primarily mitigate forgetting by aligning cross-modal representations or preserving feature-level semantic similarity. However, different tasks may rely on different modalities, and learning new tasks can alter how modalities contribute to predictions on previously learned tasks. It remains underexplored how modality contributions evolve across incremental stages and how such changes relate to forgetting in MMCL. We term such changes Modality Contribution Drift (MCD) and introduce an MCD score based on controlled modality-subset interventions. Our theoretical and empirical analyses show how contribution drift can lead to forgetting, while existing MMCL and conventional CL methods do not effectively mitigate MCD. To address this issue, we propose Continual Modality Contribution Drift Regularization (CMCDR) to preserve the modality contribution profiles of previously learned tasks in both replay-based and replay-free settings. In the replay-based setting, CMCDR estimates modality contributions from stored old samples and regularizes their drift relative to a frozen previous model. In the replay-free setting, CMCDR uses current-task samples as probes to match old-class contribution profiles between the current and frozen models without storing old exemplars. Across six benchmarks covering multimodal class-incremental learning and continual multimodal question answering, CMCDR substantially reduces modality contribution drift, improves average accuracy by 0.88-7.66 percentage points, and reduces average forgetting by 0.85-11.55 percentage points over the corresponding baselines.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.