Aug 2026· The Lancet Regional Health - Americas· Vol 62, pp. 101596· 0 citations· 26 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Assessment of the potential public health and economic value of mRNA immunotherapies as cancer treatments and outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and metastatic melanoma finds the economic value is substantially exceeding the funding cut and highlighting the long-term value of continued innovation in mRNA-based therapeutics.
Abstract
Summary Messenger RNA (mRNA) technology helped prevent millions of deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic and is emerging as a promising cancer treatment modality. Early-phase trials suggest mRNA immunotherapies can improve overall and recurrence-free survival. However, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has terminated investment in this transformative platform. Although the funding cuts target infectious-disease vaccines, they could also slow broader research across the platform, with implications for cancer applications. To assess the potential public health and economic value of mRNA immunotherapies as cancer treatments, we combined early clinical trial evidence with incidence- and demographic-adjusted survival estimates from the National Cancer Institute's SEER program to project outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and metastatic melanoma. We then applied the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Value of a Statistical Life Year ($604,246; 3% discount rate) to quantify the economic value associated with survival gains. Among U.S. patients diagnosed with these cancers in a single year, mRNA immunotherapies could avert an estimated 49,415 (95% CrI: 28,233–71,085) deaths. The corresponding economic value is estimated at $75.55 (95% CrI: $44.20–$103.43) billion, substantially exceeding the funding cut and highlighting the long-term value of continued innovation in mRNA-based therapeutics.
Analysis of the reported discrepancies indicates that heterogeneity in neoantigen prediction pipelines, assay thresholds for defining an immune response, and tumour microenvironmental context explain much of the apparent inconsistency between trials.
Prakash Bharti, Anshul Singh, Hrithika Panday et al.· Asian Journal of Biology· 0 citations
Worldwide, liver cancer is the seventh most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality, reflecting its dismal prognosis, with only approximately 20% of patients alive 5 years after diagnosis. At least 50% of patients ultimately require systemic treatment. In 2020, the systemic treatment lands...
The human monoclonal antibody MR191N provides complete post-exposure protection in non-human primates and necessitates adaptive trial designs, expanded diagnostic models, and synergistic combination therapies to address MVD.
V. Kandi, F. Branda, Mohammed Alissa et al.· Expert Review of Anti-Infect...· 0 citations
Glioblastoma remains a highly lethal primary brain tumor with limited therapeutic options. Zika virus (ZIKV) has emerged as a candidate oncolytic platform because of its tropism for glioblastoma stem-like cells and its immunomodulatory potential. We conducted a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis of preclini...
Arthur Caribé Sena, Marc S.I. Santana, Vinícius Pinto Costa Rocha et al.· Journal of Neurovirology· 0 citations
Immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape for many cancers, but its application in solid tumors has lagged. There is now evidence that immunotherapy can improve outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer, but hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer has traditionally been considered immunologically...
J. Kay, J. Dixon-Douglas, M. Harris et al.· Journal of Clinical Investig...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.