Skip to content
Review Open access

Immune reset after deep B-lineage depletion: remission is not reprogramming.

Sep 2026 · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 1 citation · 35 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Full 'immune reset' should be defined operationally as durable restoration of self-tolerance despite persistent genetic susceptibility and other contributing pathogenic factors, supported by concordant evidence across disease-relevant tissues, B- and T-cell memory, functional antigen specificity and immune reconstitution.

Abstract

Deep B-lineage-depleting therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and T-cell engagers, can induce prolonged drug-free remissions in patients with refractory systemic autoimmune diseases, prompting deep depletion and 'immune reset' as an emerging therapeutic paradigm. However, durable clinical improvement does not by itself establish immune reset, which implies elimination of autoreactive memory and reconstitution of a renewed, self-tolerant immune repertoire. Furthermore, biological evidence for immune reset following CAR T-cell therapies remains limited to date. In this viewpoint, we aim to address what evidence is required before a mechanistic claim of immune reset can be justified. We propose a provisional research agenda that separates clinical outcomes from target-compartment depletion, humoral reconfiguration, molecular quiescence and complete 'immune reset'. Full 'immune reset' should be defined operationally as durable restoration of self-tolerance despite persistent genetic susceptibility and other contributing pathogenic factors, supported by concordant evidence across disease-relevant tissues, B- and T-cell memory, functional antigen specificity and immune reconstitution. Current data are insufficient to establish this state in most patients.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

CAR-based therapies in systemic autoimmunity: from deep immune depletion toward durable immune reset.

It is argued that future progress will require tissue-validated, clonally resolved and functionally informed definitions of therapeutic success, and a three-tier framework for immune reset after CAR-based therapy is proposed: serological reset, cellular reset and homeostatic reset.

Hong-Yu Zhang, Bai-Xiu Wu, Heng-Quan Wan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Immune reset in rheumatic autoimmune disease: from a tantalising metaphor to a measurable therapeutic state.

Immune reset is increasingly invoked to describe the possibility that a one-off intervention is able to produce durable treatment-free control of rheumatic autoimmune diseases. However, the term remains imprecise and is often conflated with lymphodepletion or immune reconstitution. We argue that immune reset should den...

Thomas Doerner, E. Schrezenmeier, Andrea R. Daamen et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Immune reconstitution and tolerance-inducing therapies as promising therapeutic approaches in multiple sclerosis

This review reframes MS immunotherapy through a tolerance-centric paradigm, distinguishing continuous maintenance disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) from immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs) from immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs) and emerging antigen-specific tolerance strategies.

Alireza Beheshti Maal, M. Arki, Seyed Massood Nabavi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Beyond Remission: Risk-Adapted Maintenance and Mechanism-Guided Salvage After CAR T-Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can induce deep responses in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, yet relapse remains frequent. Neither post-infusion maintenance nor salvage after CAR T-cell failure has an established standard. MAIN TEXT This rev...

Shuai-Xi Su, Si-Jia Yan, Jia-Ying Wu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Hypoimmune platforms: from rejection to immune evasion and regulatory implications

This review summarizes current strategies for engineering immune-evasive grafts that simultaneously suppress adaptive and innate immune responses and outlines the safety considerations and remaining limitations in immune evasion that must be addressed to enable clinical implementation.

Francesco Campo, Maria Irene Bellini, Hanne Scholz et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.