Sep 2026· Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases· 1 citation· 35 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Full 'immune reset' should be defined operationally as durable restoration of self-tolerance despite persistent genetic susceptibility and other contributing pathogenic factors, supported by concordant evidence across disease-relevant tissues, B- and T-cell memory, functional antigen specificity and immune reconstitution.
Abstract
Deep B-lineage-depleting therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and T-cell engagers, can induce prolonged drug-free remissions in patients with refractory systemic autoimmune diseases, prompting deep depletion and 'immune reset' as an emerging therapeutic paradigm. However, durable clinical improvement does not by itself establish immune reset, which implies elimination of autoreactive memory and reconstitution of a renewed, self-tolerant immune repertoire. Furthermore, biological evidence for immune reset following CAR T-cell therapies remains limited to date. In this viewpoint, we aim to address what evidence is required before a mechanistic claim of immune reset can be justified. We propose a provisional research agenda that separates clinical outcomes from target-compartment depletion, humoral reconfiguration, molecular quiescence and complete 'immune reset'. Full 'immune reset' should be defined operationally as durable restoration of self-tolerance despite persistent genetic susceptibility and other contributing pathogenic factors, supported by concordant evidence across disease-relevant tissues, B- and T-cell memory, functional antigen specificity and immune reconstitution. Current data are insufficient to establish this state in most patients.
It is argued that future progress will require tissue-validated, clonally resolved and functionally informed definitions of therapeutic success, and a three-tier framework for immune reset after CAR-based therapy is proposed: serological reset, cellular reset and homeostatic reset.
Hong-Yu Zhang, Bai-Xiu Wu, Heng-Quan Wan et al.· International Immunopharmaco...· 0 citations
Immune reset is increasingly invoked to describe the possibility that a one-off intervention is able to produce durable treatment-free control of rheumatic autoimmune diseases. However, the term remains imprecise and is often conflated with lymphodepletion or immune reconstitution. We argue that immune reset should den...
Thomas Doerner, E. Schrezenmeier, Andrea R. Daamen et al.· Annals of the Rheumatic Dise...· 0 citations
This review reframes MS immunotherapy through a tolerance-centric paradigm, distinguishing continuous maintenance disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) from immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs) from immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs) and emerging antigen-specific tolerance strategies.
Alireza Beheshti Maal, M. Arki, Seyed Massood Nabavi et al.· Neurological Sciences· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can induce deep responses in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, yet relapse remains frequent. Neither post-infusion maintenance nor salvage after CAR T-cell failure has an established standard.
MAIN TEXT
This rev...
Shuai-Xi Su, Si-Jia Yan, Jia-Ying Wu et al.· Stem Cell Reviews and Report...· 0 citations
This review summarizes current strategies for engineering immune-evasive grafts that simultaneously suppress adaptive and innate immune responses and outlines the safety considerations and remaining limitations in immune evasion that must be addressed to enable clinical implementation.
Francesco Campo, Maria Irene Bellini, Hanne Scholz et al.· Transplant International· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.