Skip to content

Learning to Trust Investment Rules: Holland’s Bucket Brigade for Credit Assignment in a Production Rule Advisory System

Sep 2026 · IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics · pp. 37-44 · 0 citations · 23 references

Abstract

We present a system that organizes investment knowledge into four knowledge bases—Graham, Buffett, dividend investing, and general market heuristics—each grounded in citable, published thresholds. The system employs Holland’s bucket brigade algorithm to learn rule reliability from backtested outcomes. Multiple rules recommend the same action (e.g., SELL) as they form a coalition; after the outcome is known, credit is distributed proportionally to each rule’s contribution. A three-tier strength model tracks reliability at the per-stock, per-sector, and universal levels, revealing that a rule may work well for technology stocks but poorly for utilities—without explicit per-context rules.We evaluate each knowledge base on 87 stocks across 156 weeks using a market-relative triple barrier method inspired by López de Prado [1], measuring alpha vs. the S&P 500. Graham’s BUY signals achieve 67.8% accuracy—the recommended stock outperforms the market by ≥8% before underperforming by 8% two-thirds of the time. For Graham, the bucket brigade improves actionable signal accuracy (BUY/SELL) from 59.0% to 60.7%. Critically, the symbolic rule representation guards against temporal overfitting: every rule expresses a general financial condition, and walk-forward validation confirms that out-of-sample accuracy matches in-sample performance.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide

This work benchmarks six estimators across five datasets and two known-effect sweeps, and validate the mechanisms against a non-simulated paired reference, finding that weak overlap is governed by logger-target action alignment, not by logging sharpness alone.

Bin-Shuang Li · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

The Price of Permission: Classification Uncertainty in Constrained Capital Markets

Shariah-compliant equity screening provides a transparent setting in which institutional rules determine who may own a stock. A binary label identifies current eligibility but not whether the feasible investor base is fragmented across standards or close to changing. We define this instability as classification uncerta...

Abdulrahman Qadi, A. Sharma, Francesca Medda · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Dynamic AI-Human Co-Learning in Service Operations: Balancing Knowledge Sampling and Reputational Risks in a Two-Stage Model

The rapid adoption of AI in customer-facing services, such as digital livestreaming, promises efficiency gains but introduces profound socio-technical frictions, including algorithm aversion and trust erosion. This paper develops a two-stage dynamic optimization model of AI-human co-learning over a finite horizon, endo...

Lu-Yao Wang, K. Hu, Jian-Qiang Hu · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

CEO Arena: Evaluating Long-Horizon Multi-Agent Decision-Making in Competitive Markets

Long-horizon competition tests agents'ability to coordinate business decisions under uncertainty and adapt to changing rival strategies. We introduce CEO Arena, a benchmark that uses matched replacement evaluation to assess operating returns alongside an agent's effects on rivals and the market. Each CEO agent is compa...

An Yan, Yu-Jia Huo, Zhi-Wei Shang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.